Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7AC6C217D4
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:30:58 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and
 waiter logic to load balance console writes
Message-ID: <20180416093058.6edca0bb@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm>
References: <20180409001936.162706-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
        <20180409001936.162706-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
        <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz>
        <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 14:42:51 +0000
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >PS: I wonder how much time you give people to react before releasing
> >this. The number of autosel mails is increasing and I am involved
> >only in very small amount of them. I wonder if some other people
> >gets overwhelmed by this.  
> 
> My review cycle gives at least a week, and there's usually another week
> until Greg releases them.
> 
> I know it's a lot of mails, but in reality it's a lot of commits that
> should go in -stable.
> 
> Would a different format for review would make it easier?

I wonder if the "AUTOSEL" patches should at least have an "ack-by" from
someone before they are pulled in. Otherwise there may be some subtle
issues that can find their way into stable releases.

-- Steve