Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:49:26 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 168/189] nfsd: return RESOURCE not
 GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops
Message-ID: <20180416134925.GA12104@parsley.fieldses.org>
References: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
 <20180409001637.162453-168-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
 <20180409152746.GA25317@parsley.fieldses.org>
 <20180415143737.GN2341@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180415143737.GN2341@sasha-vm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 02:37:39PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:27:47AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >What's your default on these patches on these AUTOSEL patches if you
> >don't get an ACK or NACK?  Do you apply them anyway?
> 
> Right now it's opt-out, so it'll get merged unless you NACK it.
> 
> In general, these patches get higher visibility as a notice will be sent
> a few times for each of these, when:
> 
> 1. I added it to my queue
> 2. When Greg sends his review cycle
> 3. Once a stable kernel is released

OK, thanks for the explanation!

--b.