Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1114284imm; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/F6Ls3/xqcTVaIBcJS6RNECzu0EyMPnWokOiWNhnIZDphTWsPH0A1klpsTnZrSLFZnBpW5 X-Received: by 10.98.157.199 with SMTP id a68mr23119393pfk.237.1523914052181; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523914052; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NLi3wWYJDLvABzqILEfSnwC2ky5JenYM64ddW28t+E9eS8Qd88ki0vezVujDoRH+t2 Qbqhc5F3nYBw8Z4KA7XH1eygRYHJ/De/2oU0hNx2nYe1bs22i88q1aZSWV1xyz1lUDdg UDrvRVZE9wjC9W1bRkI1UQS8xI39DIPXLT3IaxmPL4iXXkSfdCjBelAAD/OgxQclnv4A y1JP7jy5CsU/zpl6cCb3E5Wc3JGuMTLyLqCj5xSNf5uIvpGBuHnoCZ0cKIpFIsTvFPCr Zzu7nWRDtPYctvi5yN/Eg55UAH6dOhOIASpHYdsr43urHBCJJfEsTpVxWqOKlWDSju8Z LwZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=uxH4jvBcJ6QXBGE6ALHIxe3gdTIu2m6M/FIjlF/5KZI=; b=C5Gc1Bf4RqQ/OhmE6jPc8c74ZjJSvMV8akx85QTkqf61/cidOdoSWNbB13IwYunn1d +16rNrvlZhtaLP4rlHYOugZa6ozUHVOEq5CRaXDs6GEITUv+xd8hzDVJMiqw57Gxv110 Lmt5CIHHnj3mRFnLKARD/3fDChfRUyGguHxuAM5Zal+w++J+ZmZDD2ZznGcVqVuXEuAX aRli5ck3wgM/HWgZ3hSbCOW205LJazHRpcDfuXuST82c+nv8Rbx5yVAguKyZuAa0Gn8x ZFvKkh9xJRYqhoWzWmPsoitm1FLdIdQsyUVYhmOp5kTnAolSEnsjU36rhyqzNt8VLj7c yHKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y73si4026019pgd.390.2018.04.16.14.27.17; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752004AbeDPVYw (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59202 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbeDPVYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:50 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD60B21771; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD60B21771 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:47 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "beanhuo@micron.com" , "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhad.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "rajatja@google.com" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] trace: events: scsi: Add tag in SCSI trace events Message-ID: <20180416172447.5166f854@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <4650cbf668fd4853ad98dba834141e08@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:49:12 +0000 Bart Van Assche wrote: > Which tools process these strings? Has it been verified whether or not > the tools that process these strings still work fine with this patch > applied? Ideally, tools shouldn't process trace event strings, but I'm sure some do. :-/ Getting libtraceevent out as a library is a high priority of mine, and hopefully I should get something out in a couple of months. Ideally, tools should parse the raw data and then new fields will not affect them. -- Steve