Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:41:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:41:39 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:26131 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:41:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:39:58 +0000 From: Russell King To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: rhw@MemAlpha.CX, kaboom@gatech.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seberino@spawar.navy.mil Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improved version reporting Message-ID: <20010314233958.A6124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:29:53PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:29:53PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > There is no other source. Some people like to repack but that > has no influence on versions. I believe that RedHat don't build mount and util-linux from the same tree. Maybe they do internally, but when you look at the RPMs, they appear separate: Name: mount Source RPM: mount-2.10m-6.src.rpm Name: util-linux Source RPM: util-linux-2.10m-12.src.rpm There don't appear to be any explicit dependencies between these two packages either, but they do just happen to have the same version. (I'm looking at the RH7.0 RPMs here). This of course means that the version of mount may not match the version of util-linux installed on the system. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/