Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: vmalloc: Pass proper vm_start into debugobjects
To:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        vbabka@suse.cz, labbott@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, xieyisheng1@huawei.com,
        ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
        byungchul.park@lge.com
References: <1523619234-17635-1-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
 <1523619234-17635-3-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
 <ee1e7036-ecdf-0f5b-f460-0d71b4a38dd7@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <72acd72a-7b92-c723-62d8-28dd81435457@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:39:36 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <72acd72a-7b92-c723-62d8-28dd81435457@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <e8d4c0b2-dfb5-8d4d-3bcc-30b8915d24cb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/16/2018 05:39 PM, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/13/2018 5:31 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 04/13/2018 05:03 PM, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>>> Client can call vunmap with some intermediate 'addr'
>>> which may not be the start of the VM area. Entire
>>> unmap code works with vm->vm_start which is proper
>>> but debug object API is called with 'addr'. This
>>> could be a problem within debug objects.
>>>
>>> Pass proper start address into debug object API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>   mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>>> index 9ff21a1..28034c55 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>>> @@ -1526,8 +1526,8 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int
>>> deallocate_pages)
>>>           return;
>>>       }
>>>   -    debug_check_no_locks_freed(addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>>> -    debug_check_no_obj_freed(addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>>> +    debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>>> +    debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>>
>> This kind of makes sense to me but I am not sure. We also have another
>> instance of this inside the function vm_unmap_ram() where we call for
> Right, I missed it. I plan to add below stub in v2.
> 
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1124,15 +1124,15 @@ void vm_unmap_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int
> count)
>         BUG_ON(addr > VMALLOC_END);
>         BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr));
> 
> -       debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);
> -
>         if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> +               debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);

It should have been 'va->va_start' instead of 'mem' in here but as
said before it looks correct to me but I am not really sure.