Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261506AbTHSVaO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:30:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261421AbTHSV1Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:27:25 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:36265 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261623AbTHSVYm (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:24:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:10:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm3 Message-Id: <20030819141000.7df20405.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20030819183249.GD19465@matchmail.com> References: <20030819013834.1fa487dc.akpm@osdl.org> <20030819183249.GD19465@matchmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 26 Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:38:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > +disable-athlon-prefetch.patch > > > > Disable prefetch() on all AMD CPUs. It seems to need significant work to > > get right and we're currently getting rare oopses with K7's. > > Is this going to stay in -mm, or will it eventually propogate to stock? That depends if someone does any work on it in the next few days I guess. Right now we're getting mysterious oopses down inside fine_inode_fast, which is unacceptable. > If it does, can this be added to the to-do list of things to fix before 2.6.0? > > I'd hate to see this feature lost... Show me a workload in which it makes a measurable difference. But no, it won't get forgotten. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/