Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261675AbTHSVrV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:47:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261677AbTHSVrV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:47:21 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:1202 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261675AbTHSVrS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3F429ADA.1050402@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:47:06 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rob@landley.net CC: Erik Andersen , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Will uclibc be supported in 2.6? (was Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined.) References: <200308190832.24744.rob@landley.net> <20030819172651.GA15781@gtf.org> <200308191738.36574.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200308191738.36574.rob@landley.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 576 Lines: 19 Rob Landley wrote: > I'm all for doing it in 2.7. I just want to know what I should do for 2.6. > If there's a consensus that we're talking about 2.7 and allowing ad-hockery > to continue in 2.6, I'll shut up. :) That's always been the consensus :) 2.6 is long past the point for major header surgery and breakage. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/