Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp40019imm; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49nyY6GjO0XglBVAyJLNjzzKMn/rxIA+huTUeoOpANyJTTiQLcoCecTOST6+Ui+8EMigsof X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d90e:: with SMTP id c14-v6mr2042182plz.352.1523970904277; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:15:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523970904; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AJ7iEoIMKeW3chBXNXuvuYK7epmbcAB7k7OPj8J5uaIMYlNgvUcx476hjJ9WUmnNEt EkbPuJx9lhzHfaki+5d7QFb/qwZR8eR55PkuJ9bU8XqwefzTWqBfSb/Y7BFX3SD0vkN/ er/cVeUWF/CfReIESLex2j0q9oB2NX8g3JnwQnR34yX7W6Njf9i07JHzYj9EjS3Iikcs BlaJFp6aX0rdRaglIGnydWREWWEZxFp3ghz1+ru1vpW7YOd9/XyLVZPL69tgFNrUEUgj sn1vjdAgMza07YWV9yHd4YQuJtMX1QxspTECcfGz6fM+d2rNbC+lJ9UKNoEIdSq27q2I JfiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=162sI6fWk27WZ8b3T05lbkUVq+NDlMMDY9b//cr7RAQ=; b=S61TeHqrnxThL0zb2fIjV2Io9zfu9KIx19q1uHNyR8Jgge3xnQsc6VgAJxNxHvyP9x VP0WBv9jsFIudcsovvKEieG6tiIglLzazfTO18CDCBQDVImquknPpPxijfA2kMYMNe6N DHFsfIjPeBAju/3QUv/TgPCwV9VE74dnj8+4gMrXilkMoqybfwovJA0Lie8gwvcr5ewk Uyd6cm77YuLxsqqJYAupnauKnkEt1LuojPS8LFFSoENwITjnN44ebyQQIfa7wW6gAilf Nly2M/VfqXsJTCTytXd/FwI0jFgrgOqeo/BNYFUKLn6gUMPR+YHAfR365gJfhooojzYK v0pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p13-v6si14611505pll.416.2018.04.17.06.14.50; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753755AbeDQNNH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:13:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:43932 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753731AbeDQNND (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:13:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3HDCQ0c120856 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:13:02 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hdfrkww28-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:13:01 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:12:56 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:12:53 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3HDCrCH11469134; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:12:53 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A50AA404D; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:05:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C73A4055; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:05:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.endicott.ibm.com (unknown [9.60.15.245]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:05:01 +0100 (BST) From: Nayna Jain To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, patrickc@us.ibm.com, Nayna Jain Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:12:45 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.3 In-Reply-To: <20180417131246.434-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180417131246.434-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18041713-0044-0000-0000-00000549323B X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18041713-0045-0000-0000-00002889408B Message-Id: <20180417131246.434-2-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-17_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804170119 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The TPM polling code in tpm_transmit sleeps in each loop iteration for 5 msecs. However, the TPM might return earlier, and thus waiting for 5 msecs adds an unnecessary delay. This patch reduces the polling sleep time in tpm_transmit() from 5 msecs to 1 msecs. Additionally, this patch renames TPM_POLL_SLEEP and moves it to tpm.h as an enum value. After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14 sec to ~10.7 sec. Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 3 ++- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 10 ++-------- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c index 9e80a953d693..a676d8ad5992 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space, goto out; } - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT); + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); rmb(); } while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h index f895fba4e20d..7e797377e1eb 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ enum tpm_const { enum tpm_timeout { TPM_TIMEOUT = 5, /* msecs */ TPM_TIMEOUT_RETRY = 100, /* msecs */ - TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US = 300 /* usecs */ + TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US = 300, /* usecs */ + TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL = 1 /* msecs */ }; /* TPM addresses */ diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c index da074e3db19b..021e6b68f2db 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c @@ -31,12 +31,6 @@ #include "tpm.h" #include "tpm_tis_core.h" -/* This is a polling delay to check for status and burstcount. - * As per ddwg input, expectation is that status check and burstcount - * check should return within few usecs. - */ -#define TPM_POLL_SLEEP 1 /* msec */ - static void tpm_tis_clkrun_enable(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool value); static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, @@ -90,7 +84,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, } } else { do { - tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP); + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); status = chip->ops->status(chip); if ((status & mask) == mask) return 0; @@ -232,7 +226,7 @@ static int get_burstcount(struct tpm_chip *chip) burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF; if (burstcnt) return burstcnt; - tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP); + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); } while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); return -EBUSY; } -- 2.13.3