Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp87710imm; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49GV89x573VIj/86sZNWpmE1aFdeu6nXKYSOB0S2r5357LDDAEqbFc2kBLmZ7eozAcqMzR8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:30f:: with SMTP id 15-v6mr2136405pld.365.1523973665510; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:01:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523973665; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NGD3+2x645Q5fULWRXKX+epJ2Ci2580ViXy1RH04aQqvlwDsxr3/smzCy2wQNtUVE2 tYGlGIUzFX8oajd+aHXH/gh70JbAohtkfXErZ1zGihp/uw7rO7+lXdl1vXVKKgyvhdqs zqlOnNtFu0CR+/erL6xH2yMDpH+6pOANmnuY1ofQMUm3kNLNGGXwAZNLd1RR2K0c9DEQ kFdDrTVuV19jQuqQOAlMJl3OdFQGMnGXSrQgmZoIkldRsRofQ2U0WvtVFx/mxxjnPgFA TEcY21smxhS3ES60Xu1zVAt10hoW5SUMQOTyYyO7tF0VfCu7lMatF05rOYfEWM04wnVr x+Fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=sZ+kBTdDfzVGagPeLgPmaxe6w7baokftMlX1i2PLIdY=; b=pherRRW+GI+BqoUmglDvzB+rt2lFp5SbjgOE1Cvxg2rhm0TUSlsRxkkGV6T8PzWRI9 JvTq+VOE/108N+s45d9C8fUI6wOqLUeYOUgrTDRQmtCsfb8vRsbJecsc32QfwraKYkhr 8MffoqKB+7S4flLwp64MQo3rH7PzRNYSmKQDe7f8SBNddjinMujyTQBZGWqAzNTJfFvi lEbguVog90qSYGApHlzDRvC8J3O9WVxLFy6k+Z5p3ODeWmqLa5Hf6XZGT1vatyR4hxEQ NQosy9EZCbblJ/tPZfYrz9UxPgnD+zPSTHMOkst+21O0U1yhiPCgeJ9Y24zwX4wnFhmp eBfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=V5Fih+sX; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si13808963plz.279.2018.04.17.07.00.50; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=V5Fih+sX; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754003AbeDQN7N (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:59:13 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:43991 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753771AbeDQN7M (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:59:12 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f65.google.com with SMTP id p62-v6so1685935oie.10 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sZ+kBTdDfzVGagPeLgPmaxe6w7baokftMlX1i2PLIdY=; b=V5Fih+sXe/kiedInOc6tnASiaelNEZOqGCWUcfKQjMJNe5dYwmyCvvdKU8mF9grfhQ nJdjvWPkIp5vnIA5Y726nAKD4ushr8K8Sesr14TUDrTV7sihIE7yt7WvdK+gp23pd1Nm e4qbN7vCMlcVbj5qdBQSKKxAe/8wgHtDJWy0e7s8oqog9TeCdgf26i7xsgPX2PkDqdKs yHFeZM7Duh8uNsYxrsVkFt3zarSPXv4pUeIrXYjeK12te6+XRNe1iZtZ+wKxEe7Woq+G HueKdtq6Ja6InYdCd8krAUOPT8MDseW0/S0DidSWO8Llwmr+aZbw4A+ymt6e/aVieGlV HddA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sZ+kBTdDfzVGagPeLgPmaxe6w7baokftMlX1i2PLIdY=; b=uDnOMi0vorMQBdJp5/u4ISCjGizvy7TibsdppSED45V9wghgA5JpEFOu0ETyo11FBB Ony/6cT2ptbCDlLW+lTvWLENKHRjSIZ32yHkKEQ+wPAS7fmQ/I2a8hiFexL3NhCj3mdG X+dBzqL5XMyzETvQy3N4UezNQvdA+PJq5TWcu5MkizzvFBuGobE5A5IbC4yP4NVHhdEJ VZsQUufBf/fhqkcEdBPvaKg3PPHTsBufVloFCA3nEX6XG5PytMybxpEuoHbAy6BqKxRv 43Nx03ZZz0glFywg1Njda1ZFPybduF5ObzSHpbJzJjkZnp20mTs71JAnJ2YciPQjurMe hTsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBIKvebpZEMaNMt5ahL+mhfYl1r88WVfZJdgigctu+EYFQYnPFB 9/k29KQLa26Ie33nbBQ6PdaO67Y+3GrGaGCBzVhBC7UT X-Received: by 2002:aca:e790:: with SMTP id e138-v6mr1326795oih.356.1523973551221; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:59:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.201.46.141 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:59:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180417102917.7794-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <2a2ac117-900c-77b6-f247-49777493e55f@ti.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:59:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1 To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Santosh Shilimkar , arm-soc , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2018-04-17 14:41 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski : > 2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski : >> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori : >>> Hi Bartosz, >>> >>> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>>> >>>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif >>>> support from mach-davinci. >>>> >>>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand >>>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses >>>> it as well. >>>> >>>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name. >>>> >>>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver. >>>> >>>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make >>>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one. >>>> >>>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all >>>> other boards to the new platform driver. >>>> >>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series. >>> >>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sekhar >> >> Hi Sekhar, >> >> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way. >> >> Bart > > Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how > it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine. > > Bart Ok, so the patches apply and build nicely on top of v4.17-rc1, but they only actually work with David's v9 branch. On the other hand nand doesn't work with mainline now anyway so I assume it's safe to apply them and wait for David's patches to be merged. Thanks, Bartosz