Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261530AbTHSXcF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261547AbTHSXcF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:62744 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261530AbTHSXcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:04 -0400 Subject: Re: SCO's "proof" From: "Andrei Barbu \"T'Eval\"" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com> References: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1061336053.6603.2.camel@quantum.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 19 Aug 2003 19:34:14 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 517 Lines: 12 The first image seems usless Comments are not acceptable in this type of case, that was ruled in court before over AT&T vs Berkely. So.. it's completely irrelevant in the real world. As for the 2nd they'd still have to go a long way twoards proving they didn't steal it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/