Subject: Re: scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong
From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>
To: bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <bhtt73$8i4$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
References: <3F41B43D.6000706@cyberone.com.au>
	 <1061276043.6974.33.camel@orbiter>  <bhtt73$8i4$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1061336922.1120.4.camel@orbiter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:48:42 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 536
Lines: 13

> | diff with frequents kernel releases. having a structure in place to
> | plug-in other schedulers sure helps.
> 
> I agree. In fact I'm pretty sure I said something similar a while ago.
> Unlike you I didn't do any major changes, certainly none I felt were of

Of course, i was thinking 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/