Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp155263imm; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:02:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+TN8SUqX3TM4Kunaia3NBRuWzmHuQkSjBRylHaY6RjKJV5C8D4yfYfxw1xX4CVY13h1Yji X-Received: by 10.101.99.22 with SMTP id g22mr2119121pgv.410.1523977345281; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:02:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523977345; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gKXqsbyM/66k2ifC3+dMZujFciWu03UgjxIWV62kGRnCrQg61mrK8SnC0EWFdVwqCh xjVEICyXhFBZE1AWryTChAZpZg0UmtosV84WE+CNVO9hqk661uNJJ13bnCyK2CBQBmB5 LFzzjVISWUe1viKUIq4PBtbgZwIbFOAx4c9kPfMoziByKqzrqSWG6r5VE1gXnyVU6m6Z zEPG6Rz24nRAj1SONK/mMD0lH4pRTJeWbxl96iPXiUHovW+vXvjYBib9bfc7mpSHIiJU n3PRwSstNtjfZAxcwJBX6LIrWovBeoTNKUuy2wVEh8AZBNTrU+VojaNHCadwlhpXnx10 Zocw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=oiq2uXLons2pF7yiDYzyzNDjRplGG12X5gGtnwWI/VY=; b=SbHuPpxAeAZwvW39Fp2GqMem/E3zUYOEPPx6ucmtv4bcqUMXDSd94cPBNdBRESpOzy iJNmMl7c/P38ZoKEn4VFVjusHU5C6AmvNNAD4kBDfIMFgrVlZvoxYoX4tH3xVgBwxZat VUKd72ZhPuzJjH+gvNLsQ1JpyVN8ksl3adveFgDoWo94h6xSqGYselEALCFjFtWqWXMZ ft4/ceGvDQodtj020nisLzUo8jPv4Rhtrh9UWGPlpKF5WK7pI/jGhOVXupSxD8rMvYDl pMCXE6DB8u9AxBEav8xDr+3xd53nJmIzkFTNRCWycZS4T9clIxeDm4cF6oBbd6bPI4Tq 4lnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p20si13166193pfi.345.2018.04.17.08.02.08; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752659AbeDQPAw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:00:52 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:50760 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbeDQPAt (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:00:49 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3HEvFHA064831 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:00:49 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hdjs2hgmk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:00:43 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:00:39 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:00:37 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3HF0aQk64028892; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:00:36 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6717B4C046; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:53:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354EC4C04A; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:53:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.84.230.41] (unknown [9.84.230.41]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:53:04 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools powerpc: Fix callchain ip filtering To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maynard@us.ibm.com References: <20180412171129.4422-1-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180412171129.4422-2-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3471e3e0-80ad-7a7f-96b8-60d24a4931a2@linux.ibm.com> From: Sandipan Das Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:30:32 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3471e3e0-80ad-7a7f-96b8-60d24a4931a2@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18041715-0020-0000-0000-00000412EEB7 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18041715-0021-0000-0000-000042A72F6E Message-Id: <8b57ea28-f620-2f9c-e494-3877606696a6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-17_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804170134 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/17/2018 12:29 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > This change looks good to me but seems it fixed the issue > partially.Ex, > >     # readelf --debug-dump=frames-interp /lib64/libc-2.26.so | less >     ... >     00005778 0000000000000024 0000577c FDE cie=00000000 pc=0000000000048b30..0000000000048c64 >        LOC           CFA      r31   ra    >     0000000000048b30 r1+0     u     u     >     0000000000048b40 r1+0     c-8   r0    >     0000000000048b58 r1+64    c-8   c+16  >     0000000000048bd8 r1+0     c-8   c+16  >     0000000000048be4 r1+0     u     >     0000000000048bf0 r1+64    c-8   c+16  > > 0000000000048b30..0000000000048c64 is arandom() function from libc: > >     0000000000048b30 : >        48b30:       1c 00 4c 3c     addis   r2,r12,28 >        48b34:       d0 e5 42 38     addi    r2,r2,-6704 >        48b38:       a6 02 08 7c     mflr    r0 >        48b3c:       f8 ff e1 fb     std     r31,-8(r1) >        48b40:       00 00 00 60     nop >        48b44:       00 00 20 39     li      r9,0 >        48b48:       80 b5 e2 3b     addi    r31,r2,-19072 >        48b4c:       01 00 00 39     li      r8,1 >        48b50:       10 00 01 f8     std     r0,16(r1) >        48b54:       c1 ff 21 f8     stdu    r1,-64(r1) >        48b58:       f0 8f 4d e9     ld      r10,-28688(r13) >        ... > > Your change fixed the issue for 48b30..48b40. But not for > 48b40..48b58. > > I probed at 0x48b40. > >     # ./perf record -g -e probe_libc:abs_48b40 ~/rand > > perf report without Suka's and your change: > >     # Children      Self  Trace output  >     # ........  ........  .............. >     # >        100.00%   100.00%  (7fffb7d28b40) >                 | >                 ---0 >                    __libc_start_main >                    generic_start_main.isra.0 >                    main >                    rand >                    __random > > perf report with only Suka's change: > >     # Children      Self  Trace output  >     # ........  ........  .............. >     # >        100.00%   100.00%  (7fffb7d28b40) >                 | >                 ---0 >                    __libc_start_main >                    generic_start_main.isra.0 >                    main >                    __random > > perf report with Suka's and your change: > >     # Children      Self  Trace output  >     # ........  ........  .............. >     # >        100.00%   100.00%  (7fffb7d28b40) >                 | >                 ---0 >                    __libc_start_main >                    generic_start_main.isra.0 >                    main >                    __random > > I think rand() is a valid entry which is missing in last two cases. > > Ah, good catch and thanks for the review. Will address these problems in v2. - Sandipan