Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1524041429.3528.3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:50:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl>
References: <20180417173038.25510-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
         <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 19:30 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines
> we used so far.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

[...]
> @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk);
>  	}
>  
> +	dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n",
> +				PTR_ERR(dsp_reset));
> +
> +		return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (dev->of_node) {
>  		ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
>  		if (ret) {
[...]
> @@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be
>  	 * held in reset at the time it is called.

Given this requirement, devm_reset_control_get_exclusive above is the
correct choice.

>  	 */
> -	ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset);

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>

regards
Philipp