Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1261817imm; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:58:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+5jqZcR8R8ZLHc8t68omm0htZRsEuTCEu9U8/sdU0XuUnE22OVsUTF7YFJEq70PowJUQFC X-Received: by 10.101.77.145 with SMTP id p17mr1836875pgq.275.1524059932607; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:58:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524059932; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tkB4LDm8KKlFIQG2XpGs+oR52KGVOBEuO8v/A2lcqUbDWhQS0fAzDcXTBPePYL2fZw PXkE0ZWYgjWOMPDRJwcEbZc3gjTWufSGO9orpxcZoVd0uOsmhFBITmqzkGh2tuxzkxrd Vp+rnVbzc2s1zD7f7VwoJ9gmx7bbKrwMWKaiRSHUuDn+STeHqGxmn3Qe+juZ12FkkWd/ 1gudHnGNLHFAfnfiMtLwmjsTyql13YzpEoib1Lg1S8BM9JM3hA0dh6F6ZP9V6mQxxe9t ioGbVOE5Bo4rh2KdDbvb0drphts3hDcPaKKT5pReuNfPaU11g5msXVeUgYH7iIFFd46J efBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=SCsDcgMabbqU5HMC1aRVJbfLyT+SW0Z8GgPhrTxevis=; b=oheJC6eTgtosSpoKAqENsxVd/Xm+TmAIawzpsju1lNFePG7p2VHM52cd3ugPkQ1Zw5 yeFFQrR3b0is5qk1YFMRBMS+ICFJED17BiZwoqLMQ0o7HbF2vRwrO8TgcNejvRTJOrKI 2fqWe4k1TUbAefPxUnHF5WWdeXYPaWl8+Emp8De3zHzkcPI780xWgOfq+vd97jZddSuD v1+AN6OAZW30J1PUa9cYWS/CeoV7AyQDVH6p5VgAC8CN4kg8wt60IUDdD+KlhbrFv+qo cZHzlZWuCJjHp1+99SBUGVh/Lu+TpXrwpDnrZRjxowocYCU75ZUYEmY3wFZlnTWt3UFu p8hQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v127si1138386pgv.27.2018.04.18.06.58.38; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753128AbeDRN4S (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:56:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35384 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747AbeDRN4K (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:56:10 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08D421726; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F08D421726 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:56:07 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Amir Goldstein , Miklos Szeredi , overlayfs , linux-fsdevel , linux-kernel , Howard McLauchlan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 31/35] Revert "vfs: add d_real_inode() helper" Message-ID: <20180418095607.7acfc1bb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20180412150826.20988-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20180412150826.20988-32-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20180418093845.19ca33f3@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:49:02 +0200 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > I just received this patch: > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418062907.3210386-1-songliubraving@fb.com > > > > Which removes this code. Can you review it and I'll take it. > > It shouldn't remove d_real_inode(), because that part is correct and > fixes a real bug in handling overlayfs files. > > I'll review, but apparently I wasn't CC-d on that patch. Weird. Especially since you are on the "Reported-by". My scripts know to add to the Cc "Reported-by" tags. Not all scripts do though :-/ -- Steve