Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:15:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:15:27 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:38370 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:15:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB050D3.15AF5EF1@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:19:15 -0500 From: Doug Ledford X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Frey CC: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: scsi_scan problem. In-Reply-To: <3AB028BE.E8940EE6@redhat.com> <20010314213543.A30816@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20010315130641.A14138@bfrey.dev.cn.tlan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bob Frey wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:35:43PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > 16384 LUNs for Fibre Channel. As you see, scanning is out of the > > question. You must issue REPORT LUNs and fall back on scanning > > if the device reports a check condition. I did that when I worked > Why wait for a check condition? There's an INQUIRY field bit that > indicates whether REPORT LUNs is supported. And I'm all for using it in the 2.5 kernel SCSI stack ;-) -- Doug Ledford http://people.redhat.com/dledford Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before e-mailing me about problems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/