Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp144941imm; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49ONERJYqbnTL72N1YI2O7TVLLu0V+JwW3cJ3w7aXv3pccXLUFLBtSUfeJwXl0ttxZQX9VP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:69c5:: with SMTP id m5-v6mr8025006pln.358.1524186563055; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524186563; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wy9tQTBnqS5AWDKDu4rWCowjYPsbY0znC4N1FGda8N6cui7KW5aULW/lGYNM7Irm0+ C3KXv4vc4SRjyOj8kmeNj69KRddFMFjEe+eUjCUwL1GTZwAeioinJYJV/xFr1cKAYHuM N/4pioWiq/K8k3c7+PFs5hvQqgXEbnslgDw/EEf0rhu+6ndTF5cR9uulxeTjT68dkT4H 2ab5bzyfA5yzcPij6+wJKZihZe7I/bxt+OUA7zOgLDSHNeC4rCKyKU1UNRze5LrV7yNV 94G/u4CKdCFNExC3D8eh4bRkCeU+JzX6OFL/xgIS8QC2NZoxnW5xJwHoSBB1pOCbVLmt iwEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=HAtrWL3RaPc6ojJzTyOuC+T/UTWzRUPlCVwuwnr0GcE=; b=ZGfKVPjG0t78ebrPI4OZ1d6GS/16PIE+6+jHyDQiHACNLBy4fNgJlz+EP3ATHIOOuC 4AM+xD0Kb3RcdKZtwGks8K3sgqgTq4HCpKxsUHHKJKy7iz51IVlxsslIXm/Z6RrYLFC8 zAZQmFA4mPMwv93q1zW6hzXxqX0mIGfQgGJCbn8EkthpYaB+uL3TsxGbhDl80EMBVkgx VIunIAhxjgqHb1T9RfzSi1wnJ0dyPiPltei+pn9hRNKS24bKvcq4G/CUy+msugzc0LMF WDAUvZosWByI3IVYwDR8j8dacJ0kCmSDT6bta5X7TK+Gqru2Lj7k4AHvN6F7kujIax+n vKrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s11si3780946pgp.680.2018.04.19.18.09.08; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754221AbeDTBHr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:07:47 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:44677 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754035AbeDTBHp (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:07:45 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KWf-0006ZH-0W; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:07:45 -0600 Received: from [97.119.174.25] (helo=x220.int.ebiederm.org) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KWP-00014u-JP; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:07:44 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 20:04:01 -0500 Message-Id: <20180420010408.24438-10-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <878t9ilmhv.fsf@xmission.com> References: <878t9ilmhv.fsf@xmission.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1f9KWP-00014u-JP;;;mid=<20180420010408.24438-10-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.174.25;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18af6b2EsMQtR/b4U8JISa5vhZpeSY2NhQ= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.174.25 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TR_Symld_Words,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4981] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 15020 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.2 (0.0%), b_tie_ro: 1.54 (0.0%), parse: 0.71 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (0.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.83 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.7 (0.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.18 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.96 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 20 (0.1%), check_bayes: 19 (0.1%), b_tokenize: 8 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.0%), b_comp_prob: 1.43 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.6 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.56 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 196 (1.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.46 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.6 (0.0%), tests_pri_500: 14784 (98.4%), poll_dns_idle: 14777 (98.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 10/17] signal: Remove ifdefs for BUS_MCEERR_AR and BUS_MCEERR_AO X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With the recent architecture cleanups these si_codes are always defined so there is no need to test for them. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/signalfd.c | 15 ++------------- kernel/signal.c | 24 ++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/signalfd.c b/fs/signalfd.c index d2187a813376..ff302bf50be4 100644 --- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -117,26 +117,15 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct signalfd_siginfo __user *uinfo, #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO err |= __put_user(kinfo->si_trapno, &uinfo->ssi_trapno); #endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEERR_AO /* * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field, * so check explicitly for the right codes here. */ if (kinfo->si_signo == SIGBUS && - kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO) + ((kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR) || + (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))) err |= __put_user((short) kinfo->si_addr_lsb, &uinfo->ssi_addr_lsb); -#endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEERR_AR - /* - * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field, - * so check explicitly for the right codes here. - */ - if (kinfo->si_signo == SIGBUS && - kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR) - err |= __put_user((short) kinfo->si_addr_lsb, - &uinfo->ssi_addr_lsb); -#endif break; case SIL_CHLD: err |= __put_user(kinfo->si_pid, &uinfo->ssi_pid); diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index a6d55a6e9915..b87a9c21f698 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1539,7 +1539,6 @@ int send_sig_fault(int sig, int code, void __user *addr return send_sig_info(info.si_signo, &info, t); } -#if defined(BUS_MCEERR_AO) && defined(BUS_MCEERR_AR) int force_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb, struct task_struct *t) { struct siginfo info; @@ -1568,7 +1567,6 @@ int send_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb, struct task_struct * return send_sig_info(info.si_signo, &info, t); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(send_sig_mceerr); -#endif int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper) { @@ -2880,14 +2878,11 @@ int __copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to, #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO new.si_trapno = from->si_trapno; #endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEERR_AR - if ((from->si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR)) - new.si_addr_lsb = from->si_addr_lsb; -#endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEERR_AO - if ((from->si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) + if ((from->si_signo == SIGBUS) && + ((from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR) || + (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))) new.si_addr_lsb = from->si_addr_lsb; -#endif + if ((from->si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) { new.si_lower = ptr_to_compat(from->si_lower); @@ -2964,14 +2959,11 @@ int copy_siginfo_from_user32(struct siginfo *to, #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO to->si_trapno = from.si_trapno; #endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEERR_AR - if ((from.si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from.si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR)) + if ((from.si_signo == SIGBUS) && + ((from.si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR) || + (from.si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))) to->si_addr_lsb = from.si_addr_lsb; -#endif -#ifdef BUS_MCEER_AO - if ((from.si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from.si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) - to->si_addr_lsb = from.si_addr_lsb; -#endif + if ((from.si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from.si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) { to->si_lower = compat_ptr(from.si_lower); to->si_upper = compat_ptr(from.si_upper); -- 2.14.1