Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp145624imm; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:10:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/KslTudicoAWDhbq3ZolqQCsCcm49VmTZIQXf838lpKhiqfwwVQKkUZghg1dnAxoUX4yCA X-Received: by 10.101.101.207 with SMTP id y15mr6669873pgv.84.1524186612344; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:10:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524186612; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tAmG5/9/mMZi10bUDXEY5/Tx1dpEIPAHIV55EZJG5HnjHRsun37kZzIztyXH/pvFaI /dJ4EZ/fO2aCo16yxFZj3muwJfskXBzSwvVDozajli4uZTDpahSFh/qtFrvCM1tZAIxx 62uOSItBqq5tBEy3fp1TncC0bjHmHknUuNurnaJyokYdTTvu2i+OIinX70EePhBK/s/l tFMd3GDZdtn4PN3HLgrJffqfbHhrqQhH4gBU96yC/Sv8RjViUWyw/THWVUQkRA+lIRR2 B31Kd1PvLcCxqS+uSoAxwcX7JHiJTOYvZ1Qbw6P2rDo8WuMxZqTD4ydEPlOuZ/ZAxIBE Whiw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=Ft+0vUIqNDb4Q42SCzGumFw5/kx5Hqf1kuLeVPhuVjg=; b=jIUmFOELAD4W7K+xoJAOLKKRz9lAQLl105lYVPT7W1wPodqW8OkhXkaq1/51HTtr5Q H6WQ99AHTVSWCyMKHeDkHh4IJwc3cn1/hE951CZsyMjI+oPq9iBwE6c8Pq/MXzH9eBuN MwJgn9+pw8XO9fZCIKskwXCj3kuvqTq81gH94ywxPzwYHfP9+unn0DUvpnO+gqQQMce/ vug//bgG8//untKLpBu+fwQn13SOYUnj2C3d1bcazEKKPTqUVPie07VG9HZZfYTD+Wai H4MSqkNc7Gu/g+GzxEYQOBSu4ZWvWk6Tfr7Sji8zMmZbs2bEAx44H7+jZKGUi+XXDtj/ n9Tg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11-v6si4285875pls.337.2018.04.19.18.09.58; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754193AbeDTBHc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:07:32 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:50138 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754127AbeDTBH2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:07:28 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KWO-0006oP-AW; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:07:28 -0600 Received: from [97.119.174.25] (helo=x220.int.ebiederm.org) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KWN-00014u-Py; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:07:28 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 20:04:00 -0500 Message-Id: <20180420010408.24438-9-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <878t9ilmhv.fsf@xmission.com> References: <878t9ilmhv.fsf@xmission.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1f9KWN-00014u-Py;;;mid=<20180420010408.24438-9-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.174.25;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/9AhTvtDm+V2C7GuFg/qwSp4Qi6n8NInQ= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.174.25 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TR_Symld_Words,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4791] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 175 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.6 (1.5%), b_tie_ro: 1.82 (1.0%), parse: 0.67 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 9 (5.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.23 (0.7%), tests_pri_-1000: 5 (3.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.16 (0.7%), tests_pri_-900: 1.03 (0.6%), tests_pri_-400: 17 (9.5%), check_bayes: 16 (9.0%), b_tokenize: 6 (3.2%), b_tok_get_all: 4.9 (2.8%), b_comp_prob: 1.34 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (1.3%), b_finish: 0.54 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 132 (75.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.44 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (1.4%), tests_pri_500: 3.6 (2.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 09/17] signal: Remove SEGV_BNDERR ifdefs X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After the last round of cleanups to siginfo.h SEGV_BNDERR is defined on all architectures so testing to see if it is defined is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- kernel/signal.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index fc82d2c0918f..a6d55a6e9915 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1570,7 +1570,6 @@ int send_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb, struct task_struct * EXPORT_SYMBOL(send_sig_mceerr); #endif -#ifdef SEGV_BNDERR int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper) { struct siginfo info; @@ -1584,7 +1583,6 @@ int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper) info.si_upper = upper; return force_sig_info(info.si_signo, &info, current); } -#endif #ifdef SEGV_PKUERR int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey) @@ -2890,13 +2888,11 @@ int __copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to, if ((from->si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) new.si_addr_lsb = from->si_addr_lsb; #endif -#ifdef SEGV_BNDERR if ((from->si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) { new.si_lower = ptr_to_compat(from->si_lower); new.si_upper = ptr_to_compat(from->si_upper); } -#endif #ifdef SEGV_PKUERR if ((from->si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from->si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)) @@ -2976,12 +2972,10 @@ int copy_siginfo_from_user32(struct siginfo *to, if ((from.si_signo == SIGBUS) && (from.si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) to->si_addr_lsb = from.si_addr_lsb; #endif -#ifdef SEGV_BNDERR if ((from.si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from.si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) { to->si_lower = compat_ptr(from.si_lower); to->si_upper = compat_ptr(from.si_upper); } -#endif #ifdef SEGV_PKUERR if ((from.si_signo == SIGSEGV) && (from.si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)) to->si_pkey = from.si_pkey; -- 2.14.1