Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262368AbTHUBHr (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:07:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262370AbTHUBHr (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:07:47 -0400 Received: from adsl-67-114-19-186.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.114.19.186]:62605 "HELO adsl-63-202-77-221.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262368AbTHUBHq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:07:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3F441B60.9040404@tupshin.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:07:44 -0700 From: Tupshin Harper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030618 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andries Brouwer CC: Trond Myklebust , Ulrich Drepper , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: NFS regression in 2.6 -- gnome problem References: <3F4268C1.9040608@redhat.com> <20030820192409.A2868@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <16195.49464.935754.526386@charged.uio.no> <20030820215246.B3065@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <3F441213.4060906@tupshin.com> <20030821023836.B3204@pclin040.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030821023836.B3204@pclin040.win.tue.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1334 Lines: 36 Andries Brouwer wrote: >On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:28:03PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: > > > >>This patch makes the previously posted test work for me, but I'm >>experiencing a differenct NFS regression between 2.4 and 2.6. Whatever >>locking method that gnome2 is using when running home directories over >>nfs is failing when the client is running 2.6. >>Gnome reports that it failed to lock it's test file, and aborts. >>It says that the error was "no locks available". >> >> > >"Gnome" is not precise enough for me. >If you have an explicit test program that works on 2.4 and fails >on 2.6 and is not more than a single page in length, I wouldnt mind >looking at it. > > > Fair enough. I don't have such an explicit test at the moment, but I will talk to the gnome guys and see if I can come up with one. I was reporting what the gnome2 session-manager complains about, but comparable errors come from something as simple as gnome-terminal (simplest program I've seen that has the problem). FWIW, this is gnome 2.2.2. I'll get back to you when I know more. -Tupshin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/