Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180420191523.GA28597@amd>
References: <20180404165559.4cd0c12c@canb.auug.org.au> <20180404074856.GA9342@amd>
 <20180404175852.GI5700@atomide.com> <20180404184622.GA8608@amd>
 <20180404195951.GJ5700@atomide.com> <20180404201837.GA9710@amd>
 <20180415173908.GA2024@amd> <CAGXu5jK9f62n95sOdJViXHXzQFyCdcsWt9HPvcdSFRp9Qqg0bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180420073402.GA9356@amd> <CAGXu5j+6D3PiVc9SR4+31ZGDC2r5uWJOw8Sn3cDhXdNqBGH+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180420191523.GA28597@amd>
From:   Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:18:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+DvKQKLpXP50vV0yoyB_w26NK5h6KdVUSWEHvHZ-8OdVvdt9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [regression v4.17-rc0] Re: FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks ARM compilation
 in -next -- was Re: ARM compile failure in Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 4
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
        ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
        Patrik Bachan <patrikbachan@gmail.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?TWlja3Vsw6HFoSBRd2VydHo=?= <abcloriens@gmail.com>,
        Clayton Craft <clayton@craftyguy.net>,
        Martijn Braam <martijn@brixit.nl>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Matijevi=C4=87?= <filip.matijevic.pz@gmail.com>,
        Jinbum Park <jinb.park7@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 20 April 2018 at 15:15, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> >> Hi! Sorry I lost this email in my inbox. It seems this is specific to
>> >> a particular subset of arm architectures? (My local builds of arm all
>> >> succeed, for example. Can you send your failing config?) I'll take a
>> >> closer look on Monday if Daniel doesn't beat me to it.
>> >
>> > Daniel, Kees: any news?
>> >
>> > I'm aware you did not specify which Monday :-).
>>
>> Hi! Sorry, I got distracted. So the .config you sent me builds fine
>> with my cross compiler. I suspect this is something specific to ELDK's
>> compiler. I can try some other compiler versions. What version of gcc
>> is failing?
>
> I have:
>
> pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-n900$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc --version
> arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 4.7.2
> Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-n900$ arm-linux-gnueabi-ld --version
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.1.20121113
> Copyright 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Let me try with eldk-5.6:
>
> pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-n900$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc --version
> arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 4.8.2
> pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-n900$ arm-linux-gnueabi-ld --version
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.24
>
> make  lib/string.o
>
> Seems to succeed, so I guess full build will succeed, too...

It doesn't imply that a full build would work.