Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:22:59 +0200
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCO's "proof"
Message-Id: <20030821122259.677a33e9.skraw@ithnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F4437E7.2090307@longlandclan.hopto.org>
References: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com>
	<20030819145213.GC5582@gallifrey>
	<20030819150137.GA22521@gevaerts.be>
	<lt4r0du0t3.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk>
	<bi0eij$f13$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
	<200308201846.h7KIk6uu013871@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
	<3F4437E7.2090307@longlandclan.hopto.org>
Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1181
Lines: 27

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:09:27 +1000
Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org> wrote:

> This case is getting more rediculous with each day...lfmao
> 
> Oh dear, it seems that our /comments/ are alike.  Hrmm.  Pity the
> compiller doesn't take any notice of them, and therefore, I don't see
> the evidence that the /code/ has been stolen.  Also, as others have
> quite rightfully pointed out, it doesn't even compile -- syntax errors
> galore.
> 
> Lets hope some people in the legal profession have some C knowledge --
> or at least have the sense to go directly to the kernel source on
> kernel.org rather than relying on what SCO provides.

As the only case that SCO has filed up to now is against IBM (as far as I know)
you should be aware of the possibility that this proof presented is only a
piece of FUD to distract from the real issues. IBM has never touched this
source, so it is irrelevant to the case.

Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/