Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262565AbTHUKXE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:23:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262574AbTHUKXE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:23:04 -0400 Received: from mail3.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.7]:38807 "HELO heather-ng.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262565AbTHUKXB (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:23:01 -0400 X-Sender-Authentication: SMTPafterPOP by from 217.64.64.14 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:22:59 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Stuart Longland Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCO's "proof" Message-Id: <20030821122259.677a33e9.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3F4437E7.2090307@longlandclan.hopto.org> References: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com> <20030819145213.GC5582@gallifrey> <20030819150137.GA22521@gevaerts.be> <200308201846.h7KIk6uu013871@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <3F4437E7.2090307@longlandclan.hopto.org> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1181 Lines: 27 On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:09:27 +1000 Stuart Longland wrote: > This case is getting more rediculous with each day...lfmao > > Oh dear, it seems that our /comments/ are alike. Hrmm. Pity the > compiller doesn't take any notice of them, and therefore, I don't see > the evidence that the /code/ has been stolen. Also, as others have > quite rightfully pointed out, it doesn't even compile -- syntax errors > galore. > > Lets hope some people in the legal profession have some C knowledge -- > or at least have the sense to go directly to the kernel source on > kernel.org rather than relying on what SCO provides. As the only case that SCO has filed up to now is against IBM (as far as I know) you should be aware of the possibility that this proof presented is only a piece of FUD to distract from the real issues. IBM has never touched this source, so it is irrelevant to the case. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/