Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262630AbTHULwm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:52:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262635AbTHULwm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:52:42 -0400 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6]:59150 "EHLO lakshmi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262630AbTHULwl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:52:41 -0400 Message-Id: <200308211159.h7LBxOhW002506@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.1-RC1 To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Interesting VM feature? In-Reply-To: Your message of "20 Aug 2003 19:24:25 PDT." References: <147bb3140e7a.140e7a147bb3@rdc-kc.rr.com> <20030815200020.GM1027@matchmail.com> <20030815211937.GA20208@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:59:24 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 478 Lines: 14 hpa@zytor.com said: > It *would* be nice with a way to be able to say to the kernel "you may > discard this but if so I want SIGSEGV", for things like LPSM and the > like. Yeah, UML could put this to good use, as well... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/