Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2471179imm; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/R6TGv+KlCLQoELGaSjI0R60unOvriNS45F4654mUTFNVq20up/y+F0+7/GU4B4NOAAEth X-Received: by 10.98.209.92 with SMTP id t28mr4655248pfl.148.1524408258953; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524408258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FwgiYlsBvN1vYwVWrRAmoXd6ub4c56xZwaF6OquiTuWAfzrljFDwapVSBICd4xDGY1 VbRuFi68ADdN8mId+kAmdu9ml7O4Jue5xGSGI7U3ekT9iB7keCq9Hm+gOwfMlzjbIxx8 mkTTLmkeOHYmhhe2PI8P4IkcXeuKyaHP0HPzf8D/2SF9/apxzbSEFhJjdEXf/dr1bOXw YdsCEjysspCXY8Ky9hssjiKWfcS9QoIG9TkSoACjoMndDf6/j4Sw0kenRxSKXEdiowZV ynFgvo5o6UCvtne/waV7sDhK86dS1/4vUDOHaARqb4Vge53eZa59Hlc6HbkFhchXVSNI +HGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=w/tf157b0gTpuqhfAolz4S0P5YusbdCyg+S4CUc5uVM=; b=ilr3gJIl1SIhJ1Fl5rnnEgv1t13LlYfKOqcOTuJGOFaEKsxV9NV7pdEzsJWznZjGPY P9DJl4a0uE4H3Ej25gPS3qWG2L408JARg9rGngPGMpH+oup7TYP9VKjUboJsMkNJXKZ8 KQma3RODMSgmzdN/UfZlFaX0kATFmaBJG/JebHfs+sGVKAvdaxLtfxsTt6vKDVjFmXtX bWmT4bJc2XHAAB+f2ju2m2/d4u2lZvekGCfdisr1R7qFlwoiVueM0uRwoN2Nx5FBAPut NieVyj2cIs9epyxk3RlAvCPlVwM1+E7GBgv8nUh9IJBnx5elunjMXhfqC427uIuv7GnE /L8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si8526576pgq.148.2018.04.22.07.44.04; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932200AbeDVORZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:17:25 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58182 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932436AbeDVORU (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:17:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71A83CD2; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:17:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Wen Xu , Theodore Tso Subject: [PATCH 4.4 50/97] ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20180422135308.084667867@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180422135304.577223025@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180422135304.577223025@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Theodore Ts'o commit 7dac4a1726a9c64a517d595c40e95e2d0d135f6f upstream. An privileged attacker can cause a crash by mounting a crafted ext4 image which triggers a out-of-bounds read in the function ext4_valid_block_bitmap() in fs/ext4/balloc.c. This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1093. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181 BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560782 Reported-by: Wen Xu Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -337,20 +337,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bit /* check whether block bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode table block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize) + return blk; next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data, EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group), EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset)); @@ -416,6 +421,7 @@ struct buffer_head * ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) { struct ext4_group_desc *desc; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct buffer_head *bh; ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk; int err; @@ -424,6 +430,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct sup if (!desc) return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - " --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static struct buffer_head * ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) { struct ext4_group_desc *desc; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk; int err; @@ -128,6 +129,12 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_bloc return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - "