Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2474072imm; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+vWO7gJyFhz9K7Y0GPZq14FKDVNW6GUmL76P/GlB7gplInsoM54KimZHkOm7DHnCfknsVU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7008:: with SMTP id y8-v6mr17831013plk.69.1524408470189; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524408470; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yc54raLwI0hilPSO/V/J3yuoD+j3EaKh47dPp+E7H4pyPHRN2msqeGuCsAigNfSq14 JnK6XTaipXSIHuEcRJHwbsN6fiGYFX8NqewvHBsA8Qn5+XimwW4Yen8T4ByedGDIUJNK O5159bWuMMSFqUZRJp2HyPc360rPim3Mz2IuPOALwZul+fR9qGn2+tlTJmMGmS5a6B5u Iez4ygmC2v4nV60pYAwS3PVYwYqrZh59Z/leMN8ULGD/e7Gabe/6d4qRC3UP76MCHGuD 1LwoGNzeeMnJP9G/sxv1pbhoTQ9lPwBP0KA0HtT4ge0tt0KklGtpU3cwaaMPs4ENAEB7 2Wrw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=RUhLSXNPGIWE3r3p7AHGfz7jzVYaf6qwXWTKMdMgC8w=; b=SnoOCMSpjrNCISMv5yGnXvWg522epknAM0LugHfOGz9z0hl4BjRR7PzQxG6iYqRGrC rZbK6eL/YnuB490Q4Ysr1WOClX9/qFp1G9tBHNHZzPwfPzQDa0vk/xwtaJch1oiQQtRL dBxenUUNCIkwAPw2gl8ricyt4D/akRLhXZVtcZTtBEcN3Zp9WcoV0hHjkazpJROLa3g6 D67rk4am07xMU+syOJ+CUPRIebbrL2QgYW47f6hqdw7FuNo9tHY/JwqMhqRTBnWliiQI NAjmNiR68WWHy/tKRi0j/kEaaI6M96qOMY8N6kaurU8NcAHVAACwniCzK7TdYpyaMpg/ 4htg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o11si4330770pgf.542.2018.04.22.07.47.35; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932152AbeDVOQi (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:16:38 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57466 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932116AbeDVOQZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:16:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1F83CC1; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:16:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka , Pekka Enberg , Christoph Lameter , Joonsoo Kim , David Rientjes , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Boyd , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: [PATCH 4.4 29/97] mm, slab: reschedule cache_reap() on the same CPU Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:07 +0200 Message-Id: <20180422135306.823977541@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180422135304.577223025@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180422135304.577223025@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Vlastimil Babka commit a9f2a846f0503e7d729f552e3ccfe2279010fe94 upstream. cache_reap() is initially scheduled in start_cpu_timer() via schedule_delayed_work_on(). But then the next iterations are scheduled via schedule_delayed_work(), i.e. using WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. Thus since commit ef557180447f ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs") there is no guarantee the future iterations will run on the originally intended cpu, although it's still preferred. I was able to demonstrate this with /sys/module/workqueue/parameters/debug_force_rr_cpu. IIUC, it may also happen due to migrating timers in nohz context. As a result, some cpu's would be calling cache_reap() more frequently and others never. This patch uses schedule_delayed_work_on() with the current cpu when scheduling the next iteration. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180411070007.32225-1-vbabka@suse.cz Fixes: ef557180447f ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs") Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Lai Jiangshan Cc: John Stultz Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Stephen Boyd Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/slab.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -3915,7 +3915,8 @@ next: next_reap_node(); out: /* Set up the next iteration */ - schedule_delayed_work(work, round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC)); + schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), work, + round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC)); } #ifdef CONFIG_SLABINFO