Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2488274imm; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx487uQaKL/Uyve3xTGIzELoQywBtZ71KgP2BgWFzR3BIox4jnZSY1vCF0I6U1YKdFzHqOD41 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d807:: with SMTP id a7-v6mr18201344plz.314.1524409465133; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524409465; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZrrENeJPQGuNrWME8dSvrDeGOXuJTKZEfeU/mpRZgbs3Sab1DjFnhwHHTn2yagV3ij O82xruk4Mtu7JsyZ0YKQoAWxjuX3hbcmjJTjrDL1EuSoEEeXPo+tRkIyXBjNt0T1Kmtn xas6ZS70SQr5hrValaqy8GRqTYl29C+zleLXwoJ3RoYWj60IXD8sFdIhKHTdZ5Uy85Or 61UbGLaGkmdgtY7OmSQDWGSLkbUJ2sAMuVIo5zJs/9s2vzNkRfi6V1KIbTVttdy7gAGN XSGC5bMK9rWsMLrtWCAhAEicCXLx81WrKAyEgyRTzdS8lADGzwysehi7oSHmWVvmlmar 8uWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=uhdjmz4TWPoKM9KOMMZx1IFdMpoobNUILIkPfYq1/UU=; b=1K5fJTbHMbc6+vMcjOIhEWAQWjxQDkYq2r7CKWqAmNDKdcYzWqa+QF/djWXvo3ZCvh dvkojhTr0Pk+OePcU5Tib150XfLGmK3T4qylgHE9yygl0S+k0VHojOHVugvpAiqgCYfm cXETiNy9mQGZboD5YXlPbSuIWN8EqQNy8mac9f5jEXOWETBuiDvhWl9oTHALLI835kV3 nBoeeGKSfRbQqw9KZz/v9U5icP340bL+D3q1kfSvUFaHH5uGOq49UehujGivJpKWbYfk irilcEQ/mob8QqnPbufwEcupEF7KwOgURnpQ328iGWkZg/q4cXMp2P8eCS35B6WpgUE+ nPqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s189si6506803pgc.571.2018.04.22.08.04.10; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756669AbeDVOMY (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:12:24 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54878 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756643AbeDVOMK (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:12:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C46ECC6; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:12:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Aniruddha Banerjee , Marc Zyngier Subject: [PATCH 4.9 32/95] irqchip/gic: Take lock when updating irq type Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:01 +0200 Message-Id: <20180422135211.751167345@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180422135210.432103639@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180422135210.432103639@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Aniruddha Banerjee commit aa08192a254d362a4d5317647a81de6996961aef upstream. Most MMIO GIC register accesses use a 1-hot bit scheme that avoids requiring any form of locking. This isn't true for the GICD_ICFGRn registers, which require a RMW sequence. Unfortunately, we seem to be missing a lock for these particular accesses, which could result in a race condition if changing the trigger type on any two interrupts within the same set of 16 interrupts (and thus controlled by the same CFGR register). Introduce a private lock in the GIC common comde for this particular case, making it cover both GIC implementations in one go. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Aniruddha Banerjee [maz: updated changelog] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ #include "irq-gic-common.h" +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock); + static const struct gic_kvm_info *gic_kvm_info; const struct gic_kvm_info *gic_get_kvm_info(void) @@ -52,11 +54,13 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, u32 confoff = (irq / 16) * 4; u32 val, oldval; int ret = 0; + unsigned long flags; /* * Read current configuration register, and insert the config * for "irq", depending on "type". */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags); val = oldval = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff); if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK) val &= ~confmask; @@ -64,8 +68,10 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, val |= confmask; /* If the current configuration is the same, then we are done */ - if (val == oldval) + if (val == oldval) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags); return 0; + } /* * Write back the new configuration, and possibly re-enable @@ -83,6 +89,7 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, pr_warn("GIC: PPI%d is secure or misconfigured\n", irq - 16); } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags); if (sync_access) sync_access();