Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp3161402imm; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49eXRriKmgFe9LAIByLRGSuxzsb6Zug74icfUwGPG8fVzXmfSiGUTbfhzrxd+0I5Yua9DVV X-Received: by 10.99.189.26 with SMTP id a26mr16461665pgf.157.1524472094204; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524472094; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XQdILsNPdndczsn/Xar1ClwqhNPhAGzQvWQykUd5rbW4NFlvNOI1KsjcS7dthHqdhj L2hqXsBCTCxT0pzanYjJmcxHfkCJSqvL0rRcJTvbEN71peAKFU146IwosNvsghzRXRKC R5tBRRGBJbokVrcmzVZjRtZMjXUPDob369cODOHyLLZWz/pW6gH7LOXTJuSFTL6irIp1 EaIV8ubxwBVTelD4MDAkVAAB69jO34Cr+lUWUJ8CcOkfKjcsl/Tp1nKH3YZsXmhO28sY SfEFawNNPSKY9IqwKKCYAc2GKtbcvMi3VjWUJ2v6uAJ6wywh1Ly/eDbDr0Mp7RvfHZJJ 5Ajg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=BIHAwzTzjbreFtVcuQ8TW2YwqVpzTNZjiP5H6ROOdqc=; b=FY3SW7eI+EGhsof7tCQQ53JorZlmm3BTBKBMyomBhTVE+Eg/QZU6889IG8k666+zkl 9iHFtGSh/N5/8tmVe6W8t1WCY31rFB0dwcQ3lVbE6fzeP5xg+tePr0HVNcB2X3QhWdPk qs3a/vJgQZk0EBCKWdBOiUM1WuInBlcXZcONF4uyF3UvLXrgnu2rgzkZBQa5rcmFbjTr MxLBDM3CPRvwVbRLtzCW6ttjfRdxVSeda6TylEKhpE1ArJV8Cvrklii5xgVycO4kOE+/ 7DkIvI4k2WyfHndsI879e0WEV0exKcEih/OnWqANWPH5cq3vhXzCivH1ejKZaYyRqyJ6 VnYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6-v6si11536907plr.482.2018.04.23.01.28.00; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754608AbeDWI0r (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 04:26:47 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49380 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754365AbeDWI0m (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 04:26:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 442C3D01; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:26:35 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Matthew Wilcox , LKML , Philippe Ombredanne , Kate Stewart Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] LICENSES: Add CC-BY-SA-4.0 license text Message-ID: <20180423082635.GB20868@kroah.com> References: <20180422220208.772527041@linutronix.de> <20180422220833.423253901@linutronix.de> <20180423065449.GE4208@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:37:14AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Add the full text of the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to the kernel tree. It was > > > copied directly from: > > > > > > https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.html#licenseText > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > > > As we only have 1 user of this, do we really need it? > > > > Willy, it's your file, Documentation/core-api/idr.rst that is needing > > this addition to the LICENSES directory. While I'm all for CC licenses > > for Documentation, we don't seem to be very consistent with them. > > Should this be the "default" license we choose for documentation for now > > on? > > I'm all for it. If we can agree than this should move to preferred/ and not > to other/ Ok, that sounds good, Jon? I know you have looked into picking a decent license for documentation, any thoughts here? thanks, greg k-h