Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:47:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:47:35 -0500 Received: from mx1out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.51]:57291 "EHLO mx1out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:47:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:46:42 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: Lars Kellogg-Stedman , Christoph Hellwig , , AmNet Computers Subject: Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > This used to even be the way disks were located by the kernel > drivers. Now, these are found in some "random" order. > > If whatever is causing the "random" order was fixed, put back like > it used to be, etc., we wouldn't have these problems. Another alternative to path2inst or a database, I suppose, would be to use bus/pci slot information (like in /proc/pci?) to order multiple devices, so at least there's some consistency. You might have a serious headache, however, when adding a device, under that scheme. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/