Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp4763602imm; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:03:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48mgiew3xnyKjt8kwDn1s0PUZrAoyx9YnmxDkQKtyxrk+kA2LHckEdukAr7aYUAXyzJ77IW X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b84:: with SMTP id w4-v6mr17498898pll.116.1524582228793; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:03:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524582228; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZZSI4WWMfC3pBiyTSp7hIvhqndvc80uMOdQhE3R1ApV5O6Z+vsgUltd831mc9QBC7P DUkfBAnhVQC6bLbCElYIICql1ED34soaSeV2GzGp9vw9gUdFAGTfgX9JCIw7pSuV1fsP NXk7o4BiaPkeWYVj7SkES2RDpaUGVZfb9xvz/fbO5duOnmOq4+j+n5PREJTAkfIxMF9i spFaQbGbY0qekYMzmLyNHyzBENdA8qMXJ434TXK5p+1YEvVxF6tNuIRfXzML4tpUSlWE nsU9et0tCH5ZktHUsnJsE6eQFVyOqTg/2RtvcASKOwi8uBwwPNZPdIRJGN1IcDqTxCSg msKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=uR42lDOUUF/bMoU1MgLxDWN9eahsbPYQJxT6Iri3Gi4=; b=q5M+qmWAB9MRJz2LkDB1epec4EdVf36aOubylLbxG1i8VPbHT+qjpW8xcqG36SnDJd R5NR4tOJNb9Nk4w/9VDvjjjqAu4oP/zKEtzoC2eZfX1TAL8bKhUrsEaoRhPls9WC/2DF pSxQIxzI+Ck81t6j6MR0et8vnr46dVfaI7cWqJGJMO92Bzy+B1Cq7yasp4MtW8prYHbi QFeDrmFN8gSHr75rKTAqU2PDnPzK2rZDgxnePhKpX8xrJqWET+jXar3iPqNhU4N6uJG4 Rn5LKVL4yEuYujVRmM++R1K/aIsSAHKesqnreIExV24bGC17/pH8GtF+hL5Kv7qfkHGi r4dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si11904748pfi.96.2018.04.24.08.03.33; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751295AbeDXPBE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:01:04 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:36218 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbeDXPBB (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:01:01 -0400 Received: from hsi-kbw-5-158-153-52.hsi19.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([5.158.153.52] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fAzRD-00052N-Bw; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:00:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:00:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Genki Sky cc: John Stultz , David Herrmann , lkml , Sergey Senozhatsky , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT patch 0/7] timekeeping: Unify clock MONOTONIC and clock BOOTTIME In-Reply-To: <24d89dd95ab246e98562a14be05a602e@genki.is> Message-ID: References: <2580c734d38041e984215ccc522a4f2d@genki.is> <24d89dd95ab246e98562a14be05a602e@genki.is> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Genki Sky wrote: > Sorry to have been the bearer of bad news :(. No problem. We're not shooting the messengers > Again, I just have my user hat on here. It does seem like this unifying > would have been nice to have. And even, more compliant with the POSIX > definition of MONOTONIC... Yes, that was the idea > On that note, maybe it is still worth introducing MONOTONIC_ACTIVE, > but just as an alias for MONOTONIC for now. It's also more > self-documenting. Then sometime in the future, if people switch over, > remove BOOTTIME and make MONOTONIC like BOOTTIME. Though this doesn't > help simplify the code, I know. It doesn't and it does not make applications magically make use of MONOTONIC_ACTIVE. We're in a trap here..... Thanks, tglx