Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:23:11 -0500
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/95] 4.9.96-stable review
Message-ID: <20180424172311.meeo6wrsp4rtxxiz@xps>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, tytso@mit.edu
References: <20180422135210.432103639@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYt_OKQOx7xFPsbgj8+vXDJGR0Oc3XWJ8iQfMM=UkFVAeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180423165750.GA27986@kroah.com>
 <20180423180137.GA26974@kroah.com>
 <20180423222553.lbxx3cwly2fbvabs@xps>
 <20180424072635.GD18419@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180424072635.GD18419@kroah.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:26:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:25:53PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> > I made a few comments inline regarding the reported failures. Also, as
> > this report is pushing 200 lines now with all of our tests and
> > environments (about 8*22 test runs), I'm planning on making some changes
> > in the next few weeks to make it more concise and useful. Any
> > suggestions or feature requests are most welcome.
> 
> How about only reporting problems?  Having tests "pass" is the norm and
> should always happen, right?  That would make the reports smaller.

I agree, though I would like to provide a bit of context so that people
new to the process have some idea about testing breadth and depth - but
it should be a few lines, rather than the hundreds that we have now.

Dan