Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <122064928.616643.1524594231224@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20180420212641.30338-1-antonio.intilisano@gmail.com>
 <a62dded5-0fa9-1a6e-dd71-3e03cc311f1f@debian.org> <CAHp75VdSOGnN5=yxkk1m3=7rBKR1PU3NfO6QNp7wYR7Qx6mWkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1690760144.5633578.1524494921916@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHp75VeDhyKmcJqA5paqJEPsw-gpzq7iJee+zu=ZMqUpDv0_6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1524589355.21176.507.camel@linux.intel.com> <122064928.616643.1524594231224@mail.yahoo.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 21:33:14 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdMHqo=S+xgFPSv7U+3mHn7DpjXC0KSgSZB+wDZLwRV4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: add another KEY_POWER keycode
To:     Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Antonio Rosario Intilisano <antonio.intilisano@gmail.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        "vger@kernel.org" <vger@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
>>Or I missed the point and it's working? Tell me what to do with it.
>>For now I pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
>
>
> Antonio did patch and build a custom kernel locally (testing was successful), and submitted
> the patch to me.
>
> I pinged some Ubuntu folks to get it applied, and also testing with the .deb provided
> by kernel team was good, so I presume this is a safe patch that can be applied right now
> as-is.
> (this is a trivial patch, Antonio told me in another channel that he can also create and post
> failures logs before and after, as well as do some video with the key pressed).
>
> I don't think this is needed, but if you want it for historical purposes, just ask and we will
> do our best to provide them!

Thanks for a sync.

What I asked before still stands, i.e. would be nice to have Tested-by
tag by someone who actually tested the change.

Feel free to respond here with it I hope patchwork catch it up.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko