Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] staging: bcm2835-audio: Disconnect and free
 vchi_instance on module_exit()
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20180424071618.GB17825@kroah.com>
 <20180424074459.7215-1-k.marinushkin@gmail.com>
 <9e4fc4a0-370b-9101-2809-4040de58553c@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vd=_7g4N6b2Mkw1dLOao6gFsQuhzO7-9d=1kjyX0kgMAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Kirill Marinushkin <k.marinushkin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2c7fc106-4c57-5e55-4f45-8fcf03a40dda@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 20:51:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd=_7g4N6b2Mkw1dLOao6gFsQuhzO7-9d=1kjyX0kgMAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/24/18 20:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Kirill Marinushkin
> <k.marinushkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> @Andy
>>
>>> AFAIR I gave you a tag and you again missed it.
>>> Before sending anything just check twice if all prerequisites are fulfilled.
>> I think you mix it up. This is a new patch, you didn't review it before.
> Ah, okay, send new version as a separate thread and if I have time I
> would review it.
>

Thank you!
But it will be in the same thread. From my understanding, keeping the thread
when sending new versions of a patch helps to keep tracking of the conversation