Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp5041087imm; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48bl4T50LzMxkvFEDh9D0A7xObBYgcVCh3edcFBwkSdahlgovmqfUj1mYjxp5JvjFZowxlX X-Received: by 10.99.95.130 with SMTP id t124mr21501269pgb.150.1524598692363; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524598692; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gk/moG62E1uWRBQI/L0NXLJK+VFRlFEdmGLecDwNFZPLiiexeH+7j5a5NyQODGERpI +PdqvnHGGc4sbhYtT5MKTtA9xt9htu8KefWt4+rm3TUaLE0M+srh6T8LY8Pn9BEkfLmA jFPQb+dYV4HIQZnbtF1IKkkZ+lA8U7uphBcXLpFlYPzuen0wm5TzDNZBCxGhWjtZJnBk EVBTKiBf9BxpR6OzIGG20keK92/YGIiVAnxcp4MXXzslicFic/4cxIa/iP3hAcPXSPI2 BhRZ3TU8n+xpPrCXMTCR4/VIxisGY6jpXv5emtDo1YF55ou+BCj+nZR2VQk/aqzvRxcY QOuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=pcsV+rLbZ4/DCbyzN+b4VvKZ5/+If1FZArGEuCFhKlk=; b=LHJ2GL0y5VF493ZatR6PL/wvjtdky4Qu/UZLYy0WTTjely0Uux9OJHGmGeq+HQhhdc eq3TD2GyfzDqAtFGYRDsEirZZnqyJ1wFNrmArRNyIzlivhomR6wmGpLc2Gqq2ttVaodY lkdl76cDAD523Rm+ePy+VZDy5HXpbiJmAI327FLaLDgTDseEw4IsFYx8PC+GdPIclxT3 yXuawhhb799FtQk/FrCBp0+2JDfKTeWaRTsgSlGfY2gXbsNtJtj0vOoE5uE6nUM2wXke D4hZWn95bhp2/wp3B6i8vhbz4SP+SvlTlsYTp1Wo3+NVpzfT5AakayZsZp91RpXtY3vr OsAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i75si11786360pgd.399.2018.04.24.12.37.57; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752895AbeDXTfy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:35:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34020 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075AbeDXTfQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:35:16 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A40B4901C; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fidelio.ahs3.com (ovpn-117-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0D183B2A; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:35:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Al Stone To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Al Stone , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: improve function documentation for acpi_parse_entries_array() Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:35:03 -0600 Message-Id: <20180424193505.6934-2-ahs3@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180424193505.6934-1-ahs3@redhat.com> References: <20180424193505.6934-1-ahs3@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I found the description of the table_size argument to the function acpi_parse_entries_array() unclear and ambiguous. This is a minor documentation change to improve that description so I don't misuse the argument again in the future, and it is hopefully clearer to other future users. Signed-off-by: Al Stone Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/tables.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c index 849c4fb19b03..21535762b890 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c @@ -222,7 +222,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header) * acpi_parse_entries_array - for each proc_num find a suitable subtable * * @id: table id (for debugging purposes) - * @table_size: single entry size + * @table_size: size of the root table; i.e., the offset from the very + * first byte of the complete ACPI table, to the first byte + * of the first subtable * @table_header: where does the table start? * @proc: array of acpi_subtable_proc struct containing entry id * and associated handler with it @@ -400,7 +402,7 @@ int __init acpi_table_parse(char *id, acpi_tbl_table_handler handler) return -ENODEV; } -/* +/* * The BIOS is supposed to supply a single APIC/MADT, * but some report two. Provide a knob to use either. * (don't you wish instance 0 and 1 were not the same?) -- 2.14.3