Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263484AbTHVRpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:45:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263482AbTHVRpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:45:25 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:5506 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263484AbTHVRpW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:45:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:57:03 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200308221757.h7MHv3uS000585@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: hch@lst.de, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix the -test3 input config damages Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 704 Lines: 17 > Is it worth it? I see EMBEDDED as more of a "STANDARD" thing - for people > who don't care or know, that's a slight safety-net saying "this selects > the things you take for grated". I'm pretty sure that's not what it was originally intended to be, but rather what it seems to have become. On the other hand, your described usage is probably more useful to the typical user. Why not have DEVELOPER to implement the original intentions of EMBEDDED? John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/