Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp564813imm; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48ZMMp6ee7b49ACW8MbZDveDNKDyg0bN6h+DnmiUdu0MkpzmHE5mePNihwuvfsrwC+ZoVoR X-Received: by 10.98.66.143 with SMTP id h15mr16054242pfd.156.1524655278712; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524655278; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pZxM9F6pZmIeynRtSnlD1XHSsoevoGGy5kkgfA2Y/4MqSSZ5m49f1xBDBqhUA3EjyL PpHAnLH589L6eOuAQufAElcTjCUVNUPEkiflJIKveNedhYnfLIwx7C4rM2BtGLikaOff 9cRXkBU3/1teVmPH91hfo3Nbn+B1Tm73hcGHZTFexzXseoKJo92ZTv5lf2NIc110Mfqa IGkIWs64ls33Yc8AJly85lxgbu9FjI/7aKXsAOntj6ygJDxR3gCu0WNqUJxzVm89DTuU uIpJqkSp2oBLYoCuWTY85rSl1NhIJYeM0vfrtUa3bvRV7UGgaCe6yUAFzoB82oWvwt3V tzZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=vVj4vrbogwmg9q/lCHJwYmvkGNazdQ6s1pvNXBIM9rE=; b=U/KvQWfVa563seeQHQRn0b31g66AUkB8f5qPhHsEiM74ChiKfDLYpX6XgM3d0z7uqh /d8G5otQXUjCoSCyQ7/kYfsG5YvQr+3NMzLTFglVcUnh5eOHfI1IGgm2CTLJ0uXvpuHG p6kq2GVh+O6d5sH7N5LgjQp8+uW4fYSKz6+4vjZYoXlHLvjE2bmcQHn8ybWKGphHdDm+ +ArZHFHxxTVuVg17iYjdJd2cHDUR72IULlcF1uOyF+ACdzbT+VHwCrwiem2FSaorwHOm jraTe/mUWLUKi9FYSHbLOK2ger9WKLuRME93m3A50NkG3VgLvf/jXIr03wm3p+Bv0gzp sf+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u198si8811241pgc.203.2018.04.25.04.21.04; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753905AbeDYLUE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:20:04 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:50656 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753378AbeDYLT5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:19:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3PBJnnZ097559 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:19:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hjp4h7ade-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:19:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:19:54 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:19:52 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3PBJpBb7537044; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:19:51 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD194204C; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:11:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985294204D; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:11:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from oc3836556865.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.104.203]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:11:12 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] vfio: ccw: fix cleanup if cp_prefetch fails To: Dong Jia Shi , Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, bjsdjshi@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, Halil Pasic References: <20180423110113.59385-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180423110113.59385-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180424113147.139e2e0b.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180425024341.GY12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Halil Pasic Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:19:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425024341.GY12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18042511-0040-0000-0000-00000432B04C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18042511-0041-0000-0000-00002636E4EE Message-Id: <584f24d1-2dc1-4100-7919-3314b8142534@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-25_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804250108 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2018 04:43 AM, Dong Jia Shi wrote: >> [Some procedural notes: I've created a new vfio-ccw-fixes branch based >> on the s390 fixes branch for easier handling. Things targeted for the >> next release will go on the vfio-ccw branch on top of the s390 features >> branch, as before. Does that work for everybody? > I don't see a reason that why it doesn't work for me. > Works for me. >> (And I am the only vfio-ccw maintainer with a kernel.org account, >> right?)] >> > I don't have such an account, and don't know if I need to apply for one. Neither do I have a kernel.org account -- at least for now. Regards, Halil