Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261941AbTHVWZ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:25:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261963AbTHVWZz (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:25:55 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:41691 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261941AbTHVWZD (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:25:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:17:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: To: Pavel Machek cc: , kernel list Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 463 Lines: 16 > > How is strlen(NULL) better than strncpy(_, NULL, _)? Actually, the string should not NULL, but merely empty. Neither strlen() nor strncpy() will check for a NULL string. My other argument still stands. Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/