Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp662431imm; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/z1dy6BxnAEO0WrD0d04kVY4SPWWsqjr74d7bcPNIZQ0fQsLRXO0emlhdgaZ28b15vgVg8 X-Received: by 10.98.207.67 with SMTP id b64mr19668254pfg.248.1524660878115; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524660878; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x37VNNF9jIFbjISzrAmxm9VVM9CD012EET+CrfXKQlFGxisBNutxaauVGN6CAywl+r 0fYgaSfRhu5Ay9T4jKUsUud/2tHy5zS9dn31DXTmNcyR9u5r2ftAOIepWT/TQTDurh1p nBYSB60zxYBLQqw5UVB0GiQ5Ae2sOVuSXxe3IKVzBs3Q3w1KqhpiOgSq43YDd7Q4Cbhp z9oQ/gcpukMAsrcjKqd/bBSIMTmBJtdFM7LT7ugVNKPuqCUiy2ZrXo06xKOlL4LcrxlW TDaw6j1RXfpgOhNMrshc1uL460X7Yd2tpyqn1usTf8IPfgwUnfWMu7/gqv05oMS28Dhp YT3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Ib23o4KOQVpHXqTkAoWlPT5nD6PcSSfMR4c5+lD8LGo=; b=TYzJAfD2mXwUzEbpzCjvMAOTc5Waih+2CJyAwTl0bHleep/iYsVltSem9v68B2WIFu O3kiAGpNIlw/jhn7rLovKnAw0Eerf8tdh1v9BQp8THgUHEXYiGkHKSkWRxjZzi7Wue7C WvR5f+yUiNiwdU2JgqAWn88lDjsZFQkslIbZlkwgGhuvRAR7xmUz0d/75siNud1VAIiD 5nqx5iLHYYecE+Vxfdkbxj6Owcn+WGwzGHtkKCclskV1/c7VsPZwLdsbZTRZuc5HbZv7 m/djtMEfssh0uJt5KjAN7kPE6jWGYROnve2xT5bNtCZx52A/kC1izi5y1NHMzDYdutop kZAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f35-v6si13961418plh.193.2018.04.25.05.54.23; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753499AbeDYMxP (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:53:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43214 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752224AbeDYMxL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:53:11 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608CDAEA2; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Do not reserve a crash kernel region if booted on Xen PV To: Petr Tesarik , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tom Lendacky , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Mikulas Patocka , Jean Delvare , Boris Ostrovsky , Dou Liyang Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180425120835.23cef60c@ezekiel.suse.cz> From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:53:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425120835.23cef60c@ezekiel.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/04/18 12:08, Petr Tesarik wrote: > Xen PV domains cannot shut down and start a crash kernel. Instead, > the crashing kernel makes a SCHEDOP_shutdown hypercall with the > reason code SHUTDOWN_crash, cf. xen_crash_shutdown() machine op in > arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c. > > A crash kernel reservation is merely a waste of RAM in this case. It > may also confuse users of kexec_load(2) and/or kexec_file_load(2). > When flags include KEXEC_ON_CRASH or KEXEC_FILE_ON_CRASH, > respectively, these syscalls return success, which is technically > correct, but the crash kexec image will never be actually used. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Juergen