Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp672826imm; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:02:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48Kia1/JqvommvK9CQ7oVoykUxAq5T+eyJRDOTdFPL1Z9nfBQUpBs6loOwXP4YdmjEH16jj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5ac1:: with SMTP id g1-v6mr16758626plm.43.1524661379606; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:02:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524661379; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g34CdXwe5nOyAHCmBTww0IYpdO6ucvCrHnJ9HivseVDvC1Gb+lfGKHgeYCUHJs6VTo ggNOK2sLuOXU+Gzps1YbKJpSyciaKu16J8nCZazh0lKV28tYUyHllVTHxBglZM8kOs4B GjjJMiT3Tn4ZsPiUrk+G4dzlextYtS2mCRSnAFAMw+nZoBKmqwU0OZN3JGvTT0RXh0wS K9Co//R8ikHE3Ky+jR7CypZmeif/eObjEtTaA/A1hBc6SelCRDeDlYbuzmEo9atGIxD+ 8lXlfJBIul7aiA4vFc1WfKYau59PR1rqLUxErU15TbjvQXOUOUFSI3l7Z3Euu1QUURCe UiIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=7XabpFtY9Glf9k5V3iK53YmQ9q6emW/kg63jrcOT8Js=; b=R7p9zKwjLToFLyiYVivIcuKgXFgjXIKsqsQEgwpocbO5OpPIkpEJ720RRZuCaPLIZX hN/wj7GrruruHUe47s8Gi35BzZrCURJAAEnVyngSAVpLDX8gNeXNCJ7ewxLnmzdsidLY hf+eRzdT3kSF5dme/CsVbgVvWCNml9HUfLS4HVDHTUAgCNy+93Q+xSLXEX73WanpyWi9 u0ScEg0MdOEILi6OCl+XZ6FHkUyjf3b2l+wxjWbIquixVbv+GNld5ah+cHof0wUdtBDV NIm4nJktPKPKDLq479LHrD4NHWb00txSNhX9qmOqVhrzAEsdidKmZmwMXgnNuBFCDGy+ KepQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p7si11877844pgd.96.2018.04.25.06.02.32; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754493AbeDYM70 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:59:26 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:34194 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754185AbeDYM7R (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:59:17 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 2D34320650; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:59:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from xps13 (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C767B209D4; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:59:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:59:05 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Abhishek Sahu Cc: Boris Brezillon , Archit Taneja , Richard Weinberger , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Andy Gross , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: qcom: helper function for raw read Message-ID: <20180425145905.219b6faf@xps13> In-Reply-To: <892130678772dca7116bd8dcdcb3cc44@codeaurora.org> References: <1522845745-6624-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1522845745-6624-9-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <20180410114428.68d59c8d@xps13> <20180422181929.65d42ca8@xps13> <484485e160af41cf062549938c53d078@codeaurora.org> <20180423085817.74e56091@xps13> <892130678772dca7116bd8dcdcb3cc44@codeaurora.org> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhishek, On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:02:29 +0530, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > On 2018-04-23 12:28, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Abhishek, > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:58:42 +0530, Abhishek Sahu > > wrote: > > >> On 2018-04-22 21:49, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >> > Hi Abhishek, > >> > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:36:42 +0530, Abhishek Sahu > >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 2018-04-10 15:14, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >> >> > Hi Abhishek, > >> >> > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:12:24 +0530, Abhishek Sahu > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> This patch does minor code reorganization for raw reads. > >> >> >> Currently the raw read is required for complete page but for > >> >> >> subsequent patches related with erased codeword bit flips > >> >> >> detection, only few CW should be read. So, this patch adds > >> >> >> helper function and introduces the read CW bitmask which > >> >> >> specifies which CW reads are required in complete page. > >> >> > > I am not sure this is the right approach for subpage reads. If the > >> >> > controller supports it, you should just enable it in chip->options. > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks Miquel. > >> >> >> It is internal to this file only. This patch makes one static helper > >> >> function which provides the support to read subpages. > >> > > Drivers should expose raw helpers, why keeping this helper static then? > >> > >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu > >> >> >> --- > >> >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 186 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > >> >> >> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) > >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c > >> >> >> index 40c790e..f5d1fa4 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c > >> >> >> @@ -1590,6 +1590,114 @@ static int check_flash_errors(struct >> qcom_nand_host *host, int cw_cnt) > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> >> /* > >> >> >> + * Helper to perform the page raw read operation. The read_cw_mask >> will be > >> >> >> + * used to specify the codewords for which the data should be read. >> The > >> >> >> + * single page contains multiple CW. Sometime, only few CW data is >> required > >> >> >> + * in complete page. Also, start address will be determined with > >> >> >> + * this CW mask to skip unnecessary data copy from NAND flash device. >> Then, > >> >> >> + * actual data copy from NAND controller to data buffer will be done >> only > >> >> >> + * for the CWs which have the mask set. > >> >> >> + */ > >> >> >> +static int > >> >> >> +nandc_read_page_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > >> >> >> + u8 *data_buf, u8 *oob_buf, > >> >> >> + int page, unsigned long read_cw_mask) > >> >> >> +{ > > > > >> >> >> - free_descs(nandc); > >> >> >> - > >> >> >> - if (!ret) > >> >> >> - ret = check_flash_errors(host, ecc->steps); > >> >> >> - > >> >> >> - return 0; > >> >> >> + return nandc_read_page_raw(mtd, chip, buf, chip->oob_poi, page, > >> >> >> + BIT(chip->ecc.steps) - 1); > >> >> > > I don't understand this. chip->ecc.steps is constant, right? So you > >> >> > always ask for the same subpage? > >> >> >> We need to do raw read for subpages in which we got uncorrectable > >> >> error in next patch for erased page bitflip detection. This patch >> does > >> >> reorganization of raw read and moves common code in helper function > >> >> nandc_read_page_raw. > >> >> >> For nomral raw read, all the subpages will be read so > >> >> BIT(chip->ecc.steps) - 1 is used for qcom_nandc_read_page_raw. > >> >> >> While for erased page raw read, only those sub pages will be > >> >> read for which the controller gives the uncorrectable error. > >> > > Still not okay: the driver should expose a way to do raw reads no > >> > matter the length and the start and you should use that in a generic > >> > way. > >> > > >> Thanks Miquel. > >> I will explore regarding that. > >> Looks like, we can some helper like read_subpage. > > > Of course, when you implement raw accessors you can have static helpers > > to clarify the code. > > > Hi Miquel, > > I checked regarding generic function. > > Normally the other NAND controller stores the data in main area > and ecc bytes in oob area. So if page size is 2048+64 then 2048 > data bytes will go in main area followed by ECC bytes > > Main | OOB > ------------------------------------ > D1 D2...........D2048|E1..........E64 > > The QCOM nand contoller follows different layout in which this > 2048+64 is internally divided in 528 bytes codeword so it will > come to 4 codewords. Each codeword contains 516 bytes followed > by ECC parity bytes. Also in at 0x1f0 offset in each CW, the bad > block marker is stored. so each CW contains badblock marker also. > The avilable OOB bytes are 16 which is also protected by ECC. > > 516 * 4 = 2048 data bytes + 16 available oob bytes. > > So for QCOM layout, it will be something lile > > > 0 D1.........D495 B1 D496....D516 E1...E7 U1..U4 > 0x210 D517......D1012 B2 D1016..D1032 E8...E14 U5..U8 > 0x420 D1033.....D1528 B3 D1529..D1548 E15..E21 U9..U12 > 0x630 D1549.....D2044 B4 D2045..D2048 O1...O16 E22 E28 U13..U16 > > Where D - Data bytes > B - BBM bytes > E - ECC parity bytes > U - Unused bytes > O - Avilable OOB bytes > > Now, the raw read expect data to be returned in buffer in the > form of > > D1.....D2048 B1 E1...E7 U1..U4 B2 E8...E14 U5..U8 B3 E15..E21 > U9..U12 B4 O1...O16 E22 E28 U13..U16 > > Now, the puporose of that helper function is read selected > codewords. This codeword is QCOM specific and other controller > normally doesn't follow this kind of layout. > > Now If we make generic fuction for subpgage raw read with any > start and length then that function we can't use for erased page > bitflip detection. > > If we give the start as 0 with length 528 then our requirement is > to get 516 data bytes in data buffer and 12 bytes in OOB buffer > but according to standard operations, it will be interpreted as > all data bytes from D1..D528 > > so that helper function is to read selected Codewords from > QCOM NAND controller. This Codeword is different from subpages Thanks for the clarification, I understand now. Maybe you can add a comment about this particular layout and why you need this helper to check for erased pages. BTW are these BBM preserved somehow? Regards, Miquèl > > Regarding more info for layout, you can refer comment in > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c#L2191 > > Thanks, > Abhishek -- Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com