Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp735960imm; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx498QD8sPviHLOYEk159bhva+pUalHiy2lX+I5Nmr/cRwYOzutRU42GjRx5ZfQxPdgC4KJ7H X-Received: by 10.101.102.143 with SMTP id b15mr23200905pgw.183.1524664717643; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524664717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EEKI7nPrIGnS15LF04csOCiXVXH/orBsViIZqnBSkM0ibp7e/4GT7tAAIf2HbVZZf+ QevcR4UoPmr2nsT9jIxdYw/dnF2eRwVEYkgY947uFtLyBpmsw+Lofa9lvmeuVlmRzvmb lcF9xd0i/n774B15E+H+CpdbEaMuQhcIfutuJNRRN/Cw2RsGGdm+YUdwsdQDOVTHqdFV SDapCVSj3XsGr/s6Ldu5DT4ds2zgrdvgpCOu+bhwceJLRe0WRBh6lk6aMeQ+1jRy1StI imXY6oVk5OJ3dQa962cU8b6yLqVkS3s7W83Tjp7FfNCgj/nBb7m3SaXuD7bSHbLPwPti HAuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=mG8rob3gZIuc4uCOx6jg+MBRNI0l+xsyrIaPWHHpXO8=; b=J8198CYrT5e/OJZ8bokzzFzy7wLH9rnfBvT08aqxP9aHhaGVT8Q5RFpj5I1Ju3La+g fwqGedyljvOuw/kx3NELHlrh+6+dNiOIC7D93bsKGY/uzArIy+heNXKx7wKk3B8UoM8c /SOnpunBtSXUPi/rLjuay1J6K3uanMooLvZWRknafDPy5JMNePeanIB31NwA7lD15jC5 646HjozyaHY7iZLml7uT3YNX5bZKTxfkIjZXyMHuaUo48v06b+6XHOD+dzRQ7P64M23n 5C8acgk8yNYNHQHnH/tRamTw0MqbbbYfYf/3q8pGTsT6l5GmXI/3ghZ1aK1G2qmGi1y9 NA/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u12-v6si1511484plz.563.2018.04.25.06.58.22; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754594AbeDYN4k (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:56:40 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55582 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754419AbeDYNz4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:55:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3PDtAZj079340 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:55:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hjtpa90rc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:55:55 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:55:54 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:55:52 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3PDtq1O655764; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:55:52 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D3D4C05A; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:48:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0F74C050; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:48:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.224.146] (unknown [9.152.224.146]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:48:11 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] vfio: ccw: Suppressing the BOXED state To: Cornelia Huck Cc: pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <1524149293-12658-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1524149293-12658-10-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180425104429.582618f8.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:55:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425104429.582618f8.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18042513-0008-0000-0000-000004EF096F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18042513-0009-0000-0000-00001E833CFC Message-Id: <32efd6b2-78b0-ae44-3a64-a092f9d412fe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-25_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804250133 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/04/2018 10:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:48:12 +0200 > Pierre Morel wrote: > >> VFIO_CCW_STATE_BOXED and VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY are the same >> states. >> Let's only keep one: VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel >> --- >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 9 --------- >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-) > I think they were initially supposed to cover two different things: > - BUSY: we're currently dealing with an I/O request > - BOXED: the device currently won't talk to us or we won't talk to it > > It seems we never really did anything useful with BOXED; but should we? > I do not know what. -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany