Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:14:36 -0600
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with
 BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config
Message-ID: <20180425141435.bvolztivms25y2vt@ast-mbp>
References: <1524644322-9263-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <a90e398e-c012-2630-6909-6d413e03cc96@iogearbox.net>
 <20180425092547.GA24401@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180425092547.GA24401@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> 
> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for
> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change?

I suggest to fix the doc.