Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262356AbTHWJaz (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 05:30:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262540AbTHWJay (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 05:30:54 -0400 Received: from outmail.cc.huji.ac.il ([132.64.1.17]:43187 "EHLO mail1.cc.huji.ac.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262356AbTHWJav (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 05:30:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3F47347F.7070103@mscc.huji.ac.il> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:31:43 +0300 From: Voicu Liviu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030807 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: evms or lvm? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.4.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.2(snapshot 20021217) (pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm planing to move to 2.6x kernels and I don't know what should I use, lvm or evms, any 1 could help me to decide? I've heard that evms will not continue with 2.6, is it true? Best regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/RzR+kj4I0Et8EMgRAuV6AKDr3PioD0U+cdpQBJAOYpy2uzYLrQCg0UWt tGyRpNsrIg2ET1TAwtMm9Pw= =+pRf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/