Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp1733666imm; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+jpfRto5oXspEFMWSMradLlfMsPyq4VQc9G+Q/9J3Vcq44ywugGvoImKnMH2NyCFhAlIDX X-Received: by 10.98.198.7 with SMTP id m7mr31504908pfg.66.1524730313733; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524730313; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y8zFvG7kBljF5QuSXbJj9NEoIU0VzwNnl6QwHgFMcZxHduCzo2QZV1kq2UQVBrV5bY 5NFQOWXCvzozck34gtef8hG63IlFMUxvAnMMnRPqSlKxCcH6nV/sd0pfWBvocn0rgl1l MOZzXRN9j4EUJzULv0QsWEpGBlncVgvimCC+RtzxemBSeiqgNx5i2tj0GZjhgQgVTwE6 a5JbT0lL7TVZRXF9pNwYOUtbhMKXmfVTyit5SFv9xyezo/rziPyQcK3lEo8O5ScD4spb fN3tLCIR3jWOC3GkDvGgxm6iPKXqn0bGHP2gcFALD+QwnT4UPD7W0vTqdG8VFMwzx1Re iOxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=z761BPK7KaGTOyl9u5XwLM6Z3AZFmyjyboqoDaeX4vY=; b=a/LJIZ03e6u1L4wpxYoyp6YHlWoHIJUfwuL2NsEIY1c0IWBCW8bkRskq08BLwG2wNy xZ4BfTWnmuHdG2PCC+bKcPrGrwC3q2FSFD/8mwOb3STAbxVTseSGTQ01cygZyrYsaul3 sVVcvWDkUspazGpzvMDbCc17GBOYQyPOXH3uogpU30U/2LYoDGF5v/F0OkRy2rIbs45B +LKBrV7BesyWh9xMGgvejCXAF5I8bAx79sESCVG/9b+WKVHoWvlk+3PIFF/kHN0PXNpx E4UYR+T1LEcVbtfS97c8dlqzREHeDeTim47uCI5HpaFoGHEE0vOuGqnwSMDBCx++7z6Y 044w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b79si18854310pfm.104.2018.04.26.01.11.39; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754428AbeDZIKH (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:10:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33480 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754366AbeDZIJz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:09:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3Q89hY9083308 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:09:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hk96uvx1s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:09:50 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:09:04 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:09:01 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3Q891VK56623250; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:09:01 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E3FA4051; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:00:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EC4A405B; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:00:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from oc3784624756.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.212.164]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:00:57 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390 To: Martin Vuille , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com References: <20180412081959.85193-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20180412131012.GC9818@kernel.org> <25418aa4-60bb-9f16-c880-8caaf8a20931@aim.com> From: Thomas-Mich Richter Organization: IBM LTC Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:09:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <25418aa4-60bb-9f16-c880-8caaf8a20931@aim.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18042608-0020-0000-0000-000004163CBF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18042608-0021-0000-0000-000042AB409B Message-Id: <151b93fd-8e12-4abf-1e69-329de6eab777@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-26_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804260079 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2018 04:19 PM, Martin Vuille wrote: > Apologies for any problems my patch may be causing. > > I'm unclear on what is the proposed fix, other than reverting the commit. > > In the problem scenario, is a --symfs option used? Is the debug info being obtained from the symfs directory? > > Unfortunately, I've had to change my focus for the time being, so won't be able to investigate further for a while. > > Arnaldo, I'm fine with you reverting this change for now. > > Regards, > > MV > > Martin, there is no need to revert the patch. I have adopted the test case for s390 and it now stops at main, which is identical to x86. The --symfs option was not used, however the debug file selected for dwarf examination was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new) and I think that this file has not all the info (at least on s390). -- Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany -- Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294