Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2049598imm; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 05:43:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48uKWfMv6dOvod4eRjtkraA3wWVfNxzjwaPUU9NT26qx7b0hVxMAqyMXQMBRI2T0fSrPRc9 X-Received: by 10.101.98.196 with SMTP id m4mr27119823pgv.329.1524746637262; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 05:43:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524746637; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AqXC2Sxle/qwEMepc0/nYljjiUCJ7ZRTnc14tc01yaLFu6oYIL3Cp5iLeuAKir1bYq +zXiNfiWMIUYdEv1WrND7W6a//9Jy1Ox5pzbV+RoR3K0m66+xOELyaAlQWuiNLx8WZQ3 KmoKj5+9v3blHyqBf2Gqa0rrXNP73j/oYsD3YN6CdUPYLdZqGJqd6YR+jKbbbs+e2asO CZO8ccHVroi2JsFOVYBFKJXWgjz10y5EM5lnZu/YW4qq+S9pAFHduOwbUnYg272Fl7Tb 9Gu8Jd2VRDfw24+n2sgKrAXYUrK2iNK1uM9FU5wOrAeWEGXZPlNFhqDLs96NYBFaUhAe w4rQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:mime-version:organization :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=JDltXEjiahD9rg02DiHJr55xIsqvkZU5OnQz1SCdeBA=; b=oz/fgL9gMXFBTWkMysH5pcZgXcXAAegRlXEYJVENYlgEgxLKYd8pFiWApkvFxtr0k8 cvEWD/EvVp7Cjlj/BUB6hxYk03LU/sg0D7IlpP1HJ7sUaYSDeY3MnLcJoAheOk/hoLrf 0bPHn1HYNnBGBn+UdJ/FgOgviDa+1egUP9arDBzhjESj2w0UN6bxEIDkzyiM16EVszsL Zi7tCnnrtZ4BzOZuLyT087R01eyCxIHXvFk6Tep2W2o/wFl4j5DymQEnCMrKKE+9PicI pYC95llNcrO+WKaDRoM7r5Mno5XSokGNxGpOjj9mvrTyqpevoXiOiohhUG5LJugCl44y 5/Wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31-v6si14405702plk.191.2018.04.26.05.43.42; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 05:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756008AbeDZMk4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:40:56 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:42858 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754277AbeDZMkz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:40:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3QCesGa040864 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:40:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hkeau9rwx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:40:53 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:40:50 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:40:47 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3QCekYF28180536; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:40:46 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A203E11C04C; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:32:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7273F11C04A; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:32:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from dyn-9-152-212-60.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.212.60]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:32:30 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:40:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Sebastian Ott X-X-Sender: sebott@schleppi To: Arend van Spriel cc: Robert Jarzmik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: make TAGS broken with commit 99443f811c452c6 ("scripts/tags.sh: change find_other_sources()...") In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LFD 202 2017-01-01) Organization: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=22IBM_Deutschland_Research_&_Development_GmbH?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_=2F_Vorsitzende_des_Aufsichtsrats=3A_Martina?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_Koederitz_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung=3A_Dirk_Wittkopp?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_Sitz_der_Gesellschaft=3A_B=F6blingen_=2F_Reg?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?istergericht=3A_Amtsgericht_Stuttgart=2C_HRB_2432?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?94=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18042612-0044-0000-0000-0000054C58A6 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18042612-0045-0000-0000-0000288D5F74 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-26_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804260121 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Sebastian Ott wrote: > on my s390 test system make TAGS is broken since commit 99443f811c452c6 > ("scripts/tags.sh: change find_other_sources() for include directories") > > # make TAGS > GEN TAGS > xargs: etags: terminated by signal 11 > > This is a rather old etags from fedora 24. On x86 using a more recent > etags (fedora 27) make TAGS works as expected. I'll try to update the > test system maybe that'll fix the problem.. Using the same etags version as on x86 now but it still fails. Regards, Sebastian