Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2458212imm; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+MBrK5uPsGc4fEBabGqIswc9YglLZIN+LqfsqDMM+7qlpowVZJwKb8oo5Q3sWG7cDXz6ot X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ba94:: with SMTP id k20-v6mr35115995pls.193.1524766741913; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524766741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=INvIDyHbMQkdeqtaFSWf49vh+LzJWUxYMKYZ3o/vwdEf2gsA331zPVzMyiGPXfc8Cc vLr9A/O4kS01rFfdL1SmXR0eBQsQmPuWlTYhd4+uSAJQwEnpZOxZ5QwcGk/0NgyKXQPp wQaQl3TkAcsBxc3mRwjmdyeY4dPkbrws69tWLAWHUgOnYugd5DtSsn8bN+9Thi1GEcu5 ILpa460LSrlfZ95rasU0/6OhofjD5lYWPHsqDSKD9skbmZsERRbfezXvCOUfJB98WhJx Q6rzrNWd4vB5Is9VR84cPewzssMTN75qps3Y1C6YAzyQSWZhky6argdkKG3IFe/AyuxM HizQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:openpgp:from:cc:references:to:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=6WSvzz0ADTK8WiDXXeyaH7c2AC78g954xLodIqKmUdM=; b=Mr+Qcfs8cePPDLTDzQfS/RhcRiJGaSHTm+tymBpge2v9wdnkHJgClVhc3cqnVTH10r QetR91jyza2/5p5MMFtfzfpX0u9KSDp4m1KPkV2QwNuYszmd4PKlMzNBAKUCxh+vvEHz kXM7H8QKiOuU/DHLY9ClQz+RMoZ/o2ppmxfbE88BcLaepnXdirsG3+vw9bZ0BvCMnXy3 OLS22XLZF3WDVrdXn/6snG3JfHWkg8qYXXiBB3NMTrxn9Ko2Ki6QuwNO8iF9x8ejqxhI TGKzUl4sczDcBghdY6vbrKbFJKSY3s/rSA0zz4Xe5w2Ouda7uLwHOFJxK2eFgMmOVqMg lWyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c87si19130813pfd.89.2018.04.26.11.18.46; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756884AbeDZSRK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:17:10 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:46053 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754014AbeDZSRG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:17:06 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2018 11:17:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,331,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="51087925" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.17]) ([10.7.201.17]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2018 11:17:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86, pkeys: override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC To: Thomas Gleixner , Shakeel Butt References: <20180326172721.D5B2CBB4@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180326172727.025EBF16@viggo.jf.intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen , LKML , Linux MM , stable@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , shuah@kernel.org From: Dave Hansen Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:17:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/26/2018 01:55 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Hi Dave, are you planning to send the next version of this patch or >> going with this one? > Right, some enlightment would be appreciated. I'm lost in the dozen > different threads discussing this back and forth. Shakeel, thanks for the reminder! I'll send an updated set. I got lost myself and thought this had been picked up. There were a few minor comments on the [v2] set that I've addressed. I'll also check with Ram to make sure he's OK with this on ppc. We had some dueling patches at some point.