Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E9A2A21890
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Ziqian SUN <zsun@redhat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 73/74] s390/uprobes: implement arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:59:03 +0200
Message-Id: <20180427135712.969357908@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180427135709.899303463@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180427135709.899303463@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>

commit 783c3b53b9506db3e05daacfe34e0287eebb09d8 upstream.

Implement s390 specific arch_uretprobe_is_alive() to avoid SIGSEGVs
observed with uretprobes in combination with setjmp/longjmp.

See commit 2dea1d9c38e4 ("powerpc/uprobes: Implement
arch_uretprobe_is_alive()") for more details.

With this implemented all test cases referenced in the above commit
pass.

Reported-by: Ziqian SUN <zsun@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3+
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -147,6 +147,15 @@ unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_retu
 	return orig;
 }
 
+bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx,
+			     struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (ctx == RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL)
+		return user_stack_pointer(regs) <= ret->stack;
+	else
+		return user_stack_pointer(regs) < ret->stack;
+}
+
 /* Instruction Emulation */
 
 static void adjust_psw_addr(psw_t *psw, unsigned long len)