Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp804537imm; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqmM6EXTSAe+AR41Wa19OdkqohLFQb4WA7GiiF5TxTw23gWnKrpLmF/cPRsk9ODBa0bX6Po X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ac1:: with SMTP id 59-v6mr2581347plp.367.1524840478441; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524840478; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q1dC9dbplggSfzg0be6usKc1L11bej2mn5e22xqsTgecMbrj0bI/TPhVM95Wkz/zys YFb5FzIR1niukJW6GfMpkfXMh0ff0MkvDMp4G2xUXOk5KHAI4tfL4Xvi5BqUwXQbW+nL kXF0sJRsYA1F+KnqbFXnNIM4fhMh/wI2pEI9DKf2Qo2PIDijp4PZwjsSfdvNyu4feyHE Ql1qyIWIxeIbqaA88gt3pJ+UE86D0EFWQip7xw0r1b8BuxFGobCYJJ0kg5ZChKdSJmc+ wbdUT6CSRegGJIumRwh7dewQSwWs/AyGjDQis7CGDRjs7YrIbNLFoEpEXVtQx5nev9CZ Abmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter :arc-authentication-results; bh=7KAsq27tAWrKqLHGiosVPTRxuEP4SXcUGa0svriYqxY=; b=kSz3z43R2QCxan2XuBbYIYa6JvJxMCayEV/c1aDbe20FwLqp5Ll5k63CwXB5AKU6tf mA3zpefVK9zDkFYyt+LxpSr9GedJZ38D+wc2IIFKiQDjyYf5SwWMcXSvPt1/atDecwAj l0aKMK+HLA95N9KdLEFKWI1EB7nwPF1uy4mSBAdW01LpVSI56MlEDG8S84SBKYYEfOcr SWJJhArYtlncnHHB8cxwtOFDldw77L+OEWjXzkloBPam6CqdSmhLTwCOQSzLNLSjmzp0 Ute8qiAbBthZBBiyIRyiR9fGjFNjTsCpeKE7WFrWItQlKULhmF/bJYXz/qhl1GsOraRP z7fw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a2si1366960pfa.148.2018.04.27.07.47.44; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934407AbeD0OIA (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:08:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53632 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934104AbeD0OH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:07:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07CEA21892; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:07:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07CEA21892 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Eugeniu Rosca Subject: [PATCH 4.14 52/80] s390: Replace IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_*) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:58:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20180427135735.582445900@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180427135732.928644313@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180427135732.928644313@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Martin Schwidefsky From: Eugeniu Rosca [ Upstream commit 2cb370d615e9fbed9e95ed222c2c8f337181aa90 ] I've accidentally stumbled upon the IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) lines, which obviously always evaluate to false. Fix this. Fixes: f19fbd5ed642 ("s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches") Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ #include #include -int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_OFF); -int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_FULL); +int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_OFF); +int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_FULL); static int __init nospectre_v2_setup_early(char *str) {