Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp834148imm; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZozVsnj0dd8T5xWP1Qf8U4tb2akNzXlTwbKJQ8w27tf/AR/uuIfwxme8pKPxV6RgGFEAEhl X-Received: by 10.167.133.71 with SMTP id y7mr2591232pfn.210.1524842055775; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524842055; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=exVTuS/deoGnZp/8n8F+Ith4hQNmYR+sqMh3BiWwYig7M9y5g1ECG5iVQnqsBcqNHI D4aTJEiwc9cx19wWOuzF2OFWc120AKIUpB+fm7oTC1N/LluDoUzkSzm7WZGN9m4fdbCc zJsK0IcSWmBPjgpRs9Q7rwbkRMyYoLWdVntxMesEeNiEZ7LnswC7ar0OqYt0TJ91PJhj PXWJX7Hq7BU2eKE3p92gwQdjB/5Rt2oPExm6smRgeUKH085T8nqps9gR1JT/9W+RDvG+ aw3K01Fkjc/09F9sLmqIKQjs2RFqQrMR+qN/n8narRPbqwkRry5X7KnC0t0U6gcFy2rP /guQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter :arc-authentication-results; bh=owVIk2/j3C9K7tip0eoqDTwZJXFlCPHy5+LyMSIIr20=; b=iWl9oQWyHzrq2T/p3InQbNw5S2/UQm7YX225IbxzT0CthhzODr6zbtcRZsISgbE/e/ TF9qeEnxrHVD9bUIRAByVQkaezwzqXwMDeEVltrqtVa4/Ib9+UUB2TjbZoBIgj9vLPTp fBhyTmKii3mbQwacIGkawCftIzzO1jC6fEnsA7S0Z6hWZj3RgpGZizxJv1ssTrCIHDNP Oa2FyR4Z3it/H/5/iO+FMzysHPGjkOJqm3fRXRKg2dAICY9wAPU5q9rxHTGG+IqCwDc5 Zmmdk2+AWGoaK+NoQpMejVafppGMmS7iybNE3O4ywFPh+Dc7XNwsdwrcmkWQ4LYxuDe8 O8Gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p1-v6si1421366plo.128.2018.04.27.08.14.01; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933776AbeD0PLw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:11:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50502 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933057AbeD0OEG (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:04:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFED721890; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:04:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EFED721890 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Eugeniu Rosca Subject: [PATCH 4.9 38/74] s390: Replace IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_*) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:58:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20180427135711.508604985@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180427135709.899303463@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180427135709.899303463@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Martin Schwidefsky From: Eugeniu Rosca [ Upstream commit 2cb370d615e9fbed9e95ed222c2c8f337181aa90 ] I've accidentally stumbled upon the IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) lines, which obviously always evaluate to false. Fix this. Fixes: f19fbd5ed642 ("s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches") Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ #include #include -int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_OFF); -int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_FULL); +int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_OFF); +int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_FULL); static int __init nospectre_v2_setup_early(char *str) {