Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp917645imm; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:32:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqIqfjXolOsGYT/1DQ1meIzVy+DWtAZ5vBWvzs6754drqIaiPovPEH3xbfG70ekiicGdIj8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:3225:: with SMTP id y34-v6mr2963903plb.180.1524846738438; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:32:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524846738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nu+25eQJL+OSUOhqo/uPyAZXTcLK1ADMR/ivB+pCffU5v6O3cWDoQ2xVwcQ4tGQ90s y7mpch75D0/39RHL08cXsuL0hjXE2vCSkxlaOnSbqE//Ch0cy3isoD1qG+be0lNACaxM IQMqNRcosS2vyjPdrOKGsoZCDfqtk5U4npXzvuBALvAAw9y8iXpS2XBMqIm71jfKGzPY wJ0tbBhcPVqZdls4hd3X2pu0u7cY72fu8XaZyee+8rfGfPbXxIBIVX9e8uKVoSx3VtrT j92m04tz7IxCdLr026gK/aXtbicEnqHSPZLb9qD39XQOdCCI4GmZvjJImVD40aL9fk8W cpOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=CxH8/iJp6ErkanV7YzdWQ1W+dCIFtedjL4kA32UGy7g=; b=f2oVGOopH4IXNcfO20FSqSCGdXzQ/Z3yddEEUARpdUoHH6KC64e5popapO++TTATZe 7CXDUoZy6QvCSGJ6Tx9b5wG8ZqiQwdiGR/NmCg2HW9EF0HDkNTKmoMykxgImHQWjmdfL YL3MURweDw6dSoIQVefjeK5PGwdNv20nx20i26udkugk8D7fZuQJWnSSTAS25QZ48Yt2 llVkBUKMf1TCDZbhYFqoYOtvmcwRhue6jCTf2M1ZGz9K1X+lGe/OxF2g2MYNiHZelqnK D/yZi3YZgRIYHz+vRZRoU6gQxbRFed6OElM87Qw7zm3CPAOq+Qow1lFQwgy1pJeVQskV uy6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x12si1509126pfn.254.2018.04.27.09.32.04; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758803AbeD0Qak (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:30:40 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:47417 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758290AbeD0Qai (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:30:38 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6GV-0005pV-CT; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:30:31 -0600 Received: from [97.119.174.25] (helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6GU-0001B7-Sg; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:30:31 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Christian Brauner Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avagin@virtuozzo.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, serge@hallyn.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org References: <20180427102306.8617-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> <20180427102306.8617-3-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:30:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180427102306.8617-3-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> (Christian Brauner's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:23:06 +0200") Message-ID: <87po2k7gt9.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1fC6GU-0001B7-Sg;;;mid=<87po2k7gt9.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.174.25;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/kt/3ROK4orS/RBoLdH9UPvLWowxxqmb8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.174.25 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4134] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Christian Brauner X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 149 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.2 (2.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (1.6%), parse: 0.79 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (6.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.01 (0.7%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.8 (3.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.02 (0.7%), tests_pri_-900: 0.88 (0.6%), tests_pri_-400: 16 (10.7%), check_bayes: 15 (10.1%), b_tokenize: 4.0 (2.7%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (3.6%), b_comp_prob: 1.18 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.8 (1.9%), b_finish: 0.62 (0.4%), tests_pri_0: 106 (71.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.37 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.8 (3.2%), tests_pri_500: 3.2 (2.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2 v3] netns: restrict uevents X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Brauner writes: > --- > lib/kobject_uevent.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > index c3cb110f663b..d8ce5e6d83af 100644 > --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c > +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > > +static int uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(struct sock *usk, > + struct kobj_uevent_env *env, > + const char *action_string, > + const char *devpath) > +{ > + struct user_namespace *owning_user_ns = sock_net(usk)->user_ns; > + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; > + int ret; > + > + skb = alloc_uevent_skb(env, action_string, devpath); > + if (!skb) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* fix credentials */ > + if (owning_user_ns != &init_user_ns) { Nit: This test is just a performance optimization as such is not necessary. That is we can safely unconditionally set the credentials this way. > + struct netlink_skb_parms *parms = &NETLINK_CB(skb); > + kuid_t root_uid; > + kgid_t root_gid; > + > + /* fix uid */ > + root_uid = make_kuid(owning_user_ns, 0); > + if (!uid_valid(root_uid)) > + root_uid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID; > + parms->creds.uid = root_uid; > + > + /* fix gid */ > + root_gid = make_kgid(owning_user_ns, 0); > + if (!gid_valid(root_gid)) > + root_gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID; > + parms->creds.gid = root_gid; > + } > + > + ret = netlink_broadcast(usk, skb, 0, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + /* ENOBUFS should be handled in userspace */ > + if (ret == -ENOBUFS || ret == -ESRCH) > + ret = 0; > + > + return ret; > +} > +#endif