Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:47:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:46:56 -0500 Received: from raven.toyota.com ([63.87.74.200]:22533 "EHLO raven.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:46:46 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB11BF7.32FEF442@toyota.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:45:59 -0800 From: J Sloan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Maxwell CC: Rik van Riel , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: How to optimize routing performance In-Reply-To: <3AB1153F.802BEBA9@toyota.com> <20010315143611.E30509@xi.linuxpower.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gregory Maxwell wrote: > The scheduler schedules tasks not interrupts. Unless it manages to thrash the > cache, the scheduler can not affect routing performance. OK, thanks for the clarification - I need to get into the source. cu Jup - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/