Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:55:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:55:13 -0500 Received: from robur.slu.se ([130.238.98.12]:32785 "EHLO robur.slu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:55:04 -0500 From: Robert Olsson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15025.7653.808956.553263@robur.slu.se> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:54:13 +0100 (CET) To: Jonathan Morton Cc: Robert Olsson , hadi@cyberus.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to optimize routing performance In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15024.53099.41814.716733@robur.slu.se> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Morton writes: > Nice. Any chance of similar functionality finding its' way outside the > Tulip driver, eg. to 3c509 or via-rhine? I'd find those useful, since one > or two of my Macs appear to be capable of generating pseudo-DoS levels of > traffic under certain circumstances which totally lock a 486 (for the > duration) and heavily load a P166 - even though said Macs "only" have > 10baseT Ethernet. I'm not the one to tell. :-) First its kind of experimental. Jamal has talked about putting together a proposal for enhancing RX-process for inclusion in the 2.5 kernels. There is meeting soon for this. But why not experiment a bit? Cheers. --ro - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/