Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:25:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:25:34 -0500 Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:61610 "EHLO zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:25:26 -0500 Message-ID: <28560036253BD41191A10000F8BCBD116BDD8D@zcard00g.ca.nortel.com> From: "Jonathan Earle" To: "'Rik van Riel'" , "'Linux Kernel List'" Subject: RE: How to optimize routing performance Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:16:21 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-Orig: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Or are you saying that the bottleneck is somewhere > > else completely, > > Indeed. The bottleneck is with processing the incoming network > packets, at the interrupt level. Where is the counter for these dropped packets? If we run a few mbit of traffic through the box, we see noticeble percentages of lost packets (via stats from the Ixia traffic generator). But where in Linux are these counts stored? ifconfig does not appear to have the #. Cheers! Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/