Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3E4BA22D48
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:38:26 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     "julia.lawall@lip6.fr" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug-introducing patches (or: -rc cycles suck)
Message-ID: <20180430183826.GA8287@kroah.com>
References: <20180430175829.GB1544@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180430175829.GB1544@sasha-vm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:58:30PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Working on AUTOSEL, it became even more obvious to me how difficult it is for a patch to get a proper review. Maintainers found it difficult to keep up with the upstream work for their subsystem, and reviewing additional -stable patches put even more load on them which some suggested would be more than what they can handle.
> 

<snip>

/me hands Sasha some extra '\n' characters

This is great info.  Can you reformat your email to be sane and send
this to the ksummit discuss mailing list?  I think the audience there
might be a bit more receptive than the noise that is lkml at times :)

thanks,

greg k-h